460
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Applying landscape-level principles to koala management in Australia: a comparative analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 542-563 | Received 09 Feb 2022, Accepted 14 Aug 2022, Published online: 04 Oct 2022
 

Abstract

We provide a comparative analysis of two koala management plans for populations in two Australian municipalities, based on principles of landscape management: Ballarat (Victoria) and Bellingen (New South Wales). A landscape-based approach is required to protect the species, but evaluation of landscape management is limited. We present an assessment framework for evaluating local koala management plans. The plans are evaluated against a common set of principles and criteria, despite very different approaches stemming from context-specific factors. Interestingly, despite a variation in the number of indicators in the plans, the overall results of the evaluation demonstrate a similar level of performance against the criteria, and common strengths and weaknesses. In the absence of consistent standards for the protection of the koala across Australia, the species will continue to decline, and management practices will fail to protect the koala from extinction, as is currently predicted.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the authors of the two koala management plans, the organisations that supported the writing and implementation of these plans and the communities that supported them.

Data availability statement and data deposition

Detailed summary data of the analysis is available in the Supplementary Information.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Notes

1 The time-consuming nature of the assessment led to only three of the team providing assessment, reflecting the resource and capacity limitations commonly faced by evaluation (see Section 2.3). Given more resources, the scoring would have been undertaken by all members of the team. Note, however, this initial assessment provides the basis for survey tools based on the indicator statements identified.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 675.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.