119
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Is the interference between memory processing and timing specific to the use of verbal material?

&
Pages 395-402 | Published online: 11 Jan 2007
 

Abstract

Increasing load in a memory task performed simultaneously with a timing task shortens perceived time, an effect that has been observed previously with memory tasks using verbal material. The present experiments examine whether two similar memory tasks, one in which verbal material is used and another one in which nonverbal material is used, would produce similar interference effects on concurrent time reproduction. In Experiment 1, the number of nonverbal stimuli (pseudo‐random dot patterns) was manipulated in a memory task performed while a temporal interval to be reproduced was encoded. Reproductions shortened proportionally to the duration of memory processing executed during time estimation. Verbal stimuli (consonants) were used in Experiment 2 in otherwise identical experimental conditions. Effects observed in Experiment 2 were comparable to those obtained in Experiment 1. Taken together, these results support the notion that interference from memory tasks on concurrent time estimation is not determined by the specific type of material processed in memory, but instead by the duration of memory processing.

Notes

Correspondence should be addressed to Ian Neath, Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907‐2081, USA. Email: [email protected]

We would like to thank Jill Allen, Julie Jerrell, LaToya McFarland, and Julie Walter for assistance in testing participants. This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to C. Fortin.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Claudette Fortin

Correspondence should be addressed to Ian Neath, Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907‐2081, USA. Email: [email protected] We would like to thank Jill Allen, Julie Jerrell, LaToya McFarland, and Julie Walter for assistance in testing participants. This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to C. Fortin.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 354.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.