Advanced search
Publication Cover
Memory Volume 30, 2022 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,457
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

False denials increase false memories for trauma-related discussions

Charlotte A. Bückena Faculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;b Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Ivan Mangiullia Faculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;b Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands;c Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-7325View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Semiha Uzuna Faculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumView further author information
&
Henry Otgaara Faculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;b Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2782-2181View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 1158-1171 | Received 18 Feb 2022, Accepted 22 Jun 2022, Published online: 04 Jul 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Diagram of the procedure.

Figure 1. Diagram of the procedure.

Figure 2. Proportion of true memory for the interview by lying condition.

Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. *** = p < .001.

Figure 2. Proportion of true memory for the interview by lying condition.Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. *** = p < .001.

Figure 3. Proportion of false memory for the interview by lying condition.

Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. *** = p < .001.

Figure 3. Proportion of false memory for the interview by lying condition.Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. *** = p < .001.

Figure 4. Summary IES avoidance scores by lying condition.

Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. ** =  p < 0.05.

Figure 4. Summary IES avoidance scores by lying condition.Note: Each dot represents one participant. Means are represented by bars. ** =  p < 0.05.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (220 KB)

Data availability statement

The data supporting the results and analyses of this paper can be accessed on the Open Science Framework where the data has been deposited (https://osf.io/hcunq/?view_only=08769a6c41794a419243f3edab5f3d01).

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.