859
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ableism versus free speech in Australia: challenging online hate speech toward people with Down syndrome

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1711-1733 | Received 01 Dec 2020, Accepted 08 Feb 2022, Published online: 25 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Negative, ableist discourse challenging the rights of people with Down syndrome to receive support services and even to be born regularly arise on social media. This disability community has retaliated against such hate speech with resistance narratives that promote the value of people with Down syndrome, with few other recourses available. This article explores online free speech versus ableism in Australia through a major case study of 60 Minutes Australia Facebook discussions. Analysis identifies types of ableism expressed, types of harm caused and dimensions of grassroots responses. Using Timothy Garton Ash’s Citation2016 work Free Speech as a basis for contemporary analysis, we discuss: to what extent should harmful and offensive comments directed at vulnerable populations be tolerated in the name of free speech; might negative, ableist discourse contribute to any social good; and what mechanisms beyond grassroots resistance narratives might effectively respond to harmful, online ableist discourses.

    Points of interest

  • The article looks at whether the right to free speech is more important than the harmful effects of online hate speech towards people with Down syndrome.

  • We use the ideas in a book on Free Speech by Timothy Garton Ash to think about whether online hate speech should be allowed or silenced.

  • Our analysis is based on a case study of Facebook discussion threads from a 60 Minutes Australia television segment.

  • People in the disability community speaking up to create resistance narratives is the main way that online disability hate speech is challenged.

  • Other ways that could help are laws, government agencies providing support materials, and social media rules.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they held no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests in producing this work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 479.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.