690
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Membrane protein structural biology – How far can the bugs take us? (Review)

, , , &
Pages 329-332 | Received 13 Feb 2007, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1.  Membrane protein structures are hot. Analysis of high-resolution membrane protein structures collected by Stephen White (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/Membrane_Proteins_xtal.html) indicates that novel structures (black bars) are often published in high-impact journals (i.e. Nature, Science or Cell) and accompanied by ‘high-profile accessories’ (i.e., commentaries and covers). Surprisingly, improved or follow-up structures (white bars) also maintain impact, albeit less than novel structures.

Figure 1.  Membrane protein structures are hot. Analysis of high-resolution membrane protein structures collected by Stephen White (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/Membrane_Proteins_xtal.html) indicates that novel structures (black bars) are often published in high-impact journals (i.e. Nature, Science or Cell) and accompanied by ‘high-profile accessories’ (i.e., commentaries and covers). Surprisingly, improved or follow-up structures (white bars) also maintain impact, albeit less than novel structures.

Figure 2.  Eukaryotic membrane proteins produced by recombinant techniques are scarce in structural biology. Analysis of high resolution membrane protein structures collected by Stephen White (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/Membrane_Proteins_xtal.html) indicates that most structures have been solved from proteins which have been purified from natural sources (striped bar), see inset. Of these, 44% were prokaryotic and 56% eukaryotic. Another successful approach is the production of recombinant prokaryotic proteins (light grey bar), see inset. In almost all of these cases the proteins have been produced in E. coli (not shown). Eukaryotic membrane proteins have not been successfully produced in the structural biology community to date (dark grey bar). Closer inspection indicates that most of the early structures were solved from proteins purified from natural sources, whereas recombinant technology arrived more recently. We are grateful to Niek Dekker (Astra Zeneca, Sweden) for assistance with this Figure.

Figure 2.  Eukaryotic membrane proteins produced by recombinant techniques are scarce in structural biology. Analysis of high resolution membrane protein structures collected by Stephen White (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/Membrane_Proteins_xtal.html) indicates that most structures have been solved from proteins which have been purified from natural sources (striped bar), see inset. Of these, 44% were prokaryotic and 56% eukaryotic. Another successful approach is the production of recombinant prokaryotic proteins (light grey bar), see inset. In almost all of these cases the proteins have been produced in E. coli (not shown). Eukaryotic membrane proteins have not been successfully produced in the structural biology community to date (dark grey bar). Closer inspection indicates that most of the early structures were solved from proteins purified from natural sources, whereas recombinant technology arrived more recently. We are grateful to Niek Dekker (Astra Zeneca, Sweden) for assistance with this Figure.

Supplementary Table I. Structural status of the 25 largest MP families. Proteins collected by Stephen White (http://blanco.biomol.uci.edu/Membrane_Proteins_xtal.html).

Figure 3.  Venn diagrams, showing the distribution of membrane protein families. The upper panel shows the distribution of families between prokaryotes and eukaryotes and the lower panel shows the distribution of families between prokaryotes and Homo sapiens. The large number denotes the number of families that are common to that category. The number in superscript denotes the average family size and subscript, how many families in that category contain at least one member with known structure. It is evident that few are common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes/Homo sapiens. These families are however very large (i.e., conserved across many species).

Figure 3.  Venn diagrams, showing the distribution of membrane protein families. The upper panel shows the distribution of families between prokaryotes and eukaryotes and the lower panel shows the distribution of families between prokaryotes and Homo sapiens. The large number denotes the number of families that are common to that category. The number in superscript denotes the average family size and subscript, how many families in that category contain at least one member with known structure. It is evident that few are common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes/Homo sapiens. These families are however very large (i.e., conserved across many species).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.