Figures & data
Figure 1. Plasma natural haemolytic complement activity (ACH50) of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).
![Figure 1. Plasma natural haemolytic complement activity (ACH50) of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).](/cms/asset/31694229-cff0-422f-a4d8-0699bc6b9ea2/taar_a_1124329_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Plasma peroxidase activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: dprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).
![Figure 2. Plasma peroxidase activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: dprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).](/cms/asset/74c33f2c-d9f1-4450-b802-afd850584cb9/taar_a_1124329_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Plasma trypsin inhibition activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. No significant difference (P > .05) was observed between treatments.
![Figure 3. Plasma trypsin inhibition activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. No significant difference (P > .05) was observed between treatments.](/cms/asset/9e9c3cbd-21d0-4d4a-a501-582d4b67a59b/taar_a_1124329_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Plasma lysozyme activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).
![Figure 4. Plasma lysozyme activity of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).](/cms/asset/1670e8a1-28fc-4c3d-8e54-e2f473051735/taar_a_1124329_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. Plasma glucose levels of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) measured in starved groups and control group (mean ± SE). Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).
![Figure 5. Plasma glucose levels of tinfoil barb (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii) measured in starved groups and control group (mean ± SE). Control: fed two times daily to apparent satiation; S1: deprivation for 1 week; S2: deprivation for 2 weeks. Different superscripts on each column indicate significant difference between feeding strategies (P < .05).](/cms/asset/f41b4bf1-633a-4619-bbdd-7e6d64f6dbe3/taar_a_1124329_f0005_b.gif)