Gene expression profile analysis of pig muscle in response to cold stress

Figures & data

Figure 1. The distribution of novel transcripts.

Table 1. The efficiency of digital gene expression tag mapping to the transcript databases and the genome sequence.

Item	Control group	Cold stress group
All tag mapping to gene number (% of clean tags)	4763013 (81.27)	4731048 (83.52)
All tag mapping to gene number (% of distinct tags)	95833 (56.17)	90133 (58.69)
All tag-mapped gene numbers (% of ref genes)	25402 (54.50)	24971 (53.57)
Unambiguous tag mapping to gene number (% of clean tags)	3438161 (58.67)	3398164 (59.99)
Unambiguous tag mapping to gene number (% of distinct tags)	78614 (46.08)	74438 (48.47)
Unambiguous tag-mapped gene number (% of ref genes)	18952 (40.66)	18401 (39.48)
Mapping to genome number (% of clean tags)	569898 (9.72)	491863 (8.68)
Mapping to genome number (% of distinct tags)	40658 (23.83)	33938 (22.10)
Unknown tag number (% of clean tags)	387473 (6.61)	321789 (5.68)
Unknown tag number (% of distinct tags)	23663 (13.87)	20723 (13.49)

Figure 2. Terms from the component ontology with corrected P-value as good or better than 0.01.