Figures & data
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the NR5A2 nucleotide sequence of 8 species.
Note: Branches were labelled with species’ names. The number above each branch represented bootstrap values.
![Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the NR5A2 nucleotide sequence of 8 species.Note: Branches were labelled with species’ names. The number above each branch represented bootstrap values.](/cms/asset/60068f7f-9c8a-4cfd-98c4-eb73f3108227/taar_a_2020124_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Genotypic frequency, allelic frequency and diversity parameter in the exons of the NR5A2 gene in JXB sows (MEAN ± SD).
Figure 2. Analysis of blocks with 5 SNPs in the NR5A2 gene in JXB sows.
Note: The values in the squares indicate the paired linkage disequilibrium (LD) values (D’) of the SNPs. When D’ = 1, the values will not be displayed. The redder the square, the stronger the LD. The haplotype block was defined using the default setting of the Haploview software.
![Figure 2. Analysis of blocks with 5 SNPs in the NR5A2 gene in JXB sows.Note: The values in the squares indicate the paired linkage disequilibrium (LD) values (D’) of the SNPs. When D’ = 1, the values will not be displayed. The redder the square, the stronger the LD. The haplotype block was defined using the default setting of the Haploview software.](/cms/asset/5d72381a-14c3-4845-81b6-ee8500db883d/taar_a_2020124_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Haplotypes based on the block 1 and frequencies in JXB sows.
Table 3. Association of five SNPs of the NR5A2 gene with reproductive traits in Jiaxing Black sows (MEAN ± SD).
Table 4. Association of diplotypes of the NR5A2 gene with reproductive traits in Jiaxing Black sows (MEAN ± SD).
Figure 3. Relative expression levels of pig NR5A2 mRNA in 11tissues with the average ΔCt value of heart as the calibrator.
Note: Data were shown as the mean ± SD for 5 pigs. Columns ‘**’showed highly significant difference (p < 0.01).
![Figure 3. Relative expression levels of pig NR5A2 mRNA in 11tissues with the average ΔCt value of heart as the calibrator.Note: Data were shown as the mean ± SD for 5 pigs. Columns ‘**’showed highly significant difference (p < 0.01).](/cms/asset/7824f6d8-ab1c-48a7-b522-b3230c90df3d/taar_a_2020124_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Relative expression levels of the pig NR5A2 mRNA in ovary with different genotypes.
Note: In the loci of g.136759G > C, g.138864A > G with the average ΔCt value of CC and AG genotype as the calibrator, respectively. Data were shown as the mean ± SD for 5 pigs of each genotype. The column with ‘**’ showed a significant difference (p < 0.01).
![Figure 4. Relative expression levels of the pig NR5A2 mRNA in ovary with different genotypes.Note: In the loci of g.136759G > C, g.138864A > G with the average ΔCt value of CC and AG genotype as the calibrator, respectively. Data were shown as the mean ± SD for 5 pigs of each genotype. The column with ‘**’ showed a significant difference (p < 0.01).](/cms/asset/dadb06ef-6d23-4b54-a179-52b538d54150/taar_a_2020124_f0004_ob.jpg)