1,827
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How do greenspace landscapes affect PM2.5 exposure in Wuhan? Linking spatial-nonstationary, annual varying, and multiscale perspectives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 95-110 | Received 09 Jun 2021, Accepted 11 Mar 2022, Published online: 13 Jul 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. The study area and the spatial distribution of the 10 air quality monitoring sites (①-⑩) within Wuhan.

Figure 1. The study area and the spatial distribution of the 10 air quality monitoring sites (①-⑩) within Wuhan.

Figure 2. Spatial patterns of annual PM2.5 exposure (PW_PM2.5) across Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 2. Spatial patterns of annual PM2.5 exposure (PW_PM2.5) across Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 3. The time-series clustering results by K-DTW was shown in . Spatial distribution of (a) inter-annual average, (b) standard deviation, and (c) time-series clustering result of PM2.5 exposure patterns in Wuhan in 2000–2016.

Figure 3. The time-series clustering results by K-DTW was shown in Figure 8(c). Spatial distribution of (a) inter-annual average, (b) standard deviation, and (c) time-series clustering result of PM2.5 exposure patterns in Wuhan in 2000–2016.

Figure 4. The average temporal variations of PM2.5 exposure risks in seven clusters and averaged across Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 4. The average temporal variations of PM2.5 exposure risks in seven clusters and averaged across Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Table 1. The primary surface properties of seven time-series clusters.

Figure 5. Spatial distribution of PM2.5 exposure weighted barycenter in Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 5. Spatial distribution of PM2.5 exposure weighted barycenter in Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 6. Spatial distributions of PM2.5 exposure hotspots in Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Figure 6. Spatial distributions of PM2.5 exposure hotspots in Wuhan from 2000 to 2016.

Table 2. Optimal bandwidths of GWR and MGWR from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 7. Spatial distribution of local determination coefficient (Local R2) modeled by MGWR in the four years.

Figure 7. Spatial distribution of local determination coefficient (Local R2) modeled by MGWR in the four years.

Figure 8. Regression coefficients of Aggregation Index (AI) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 8. Regression coefficients of Aggregation Index (AI) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 9. Regression coefficients of Edge Density (ED) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 9. Regression coefficients of Edge Density (ED) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 10. Regression coefficients of Shape Index (SI) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 10. Regression coefficients of Shape Index (SI) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 11. Regression coefficients of percentage cover of green spaces landscapes (PLAND) from 2000 to 2015.

Figure 11. Regression coefficients of percentage cover of green spaces landscapes (PLAND) from 2000 to 2015.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (338.1 KB)

Data availability statement

The annual ground-level PM2.5 concentration dataset can be accessed from the Socioeconomic Data and Application Center (https://beta.sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/sdei-global-annual-gwr-pm2-5-modis-misr-seawifs-aod). The LandscanTM population distribution data is provided by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (https://landscan.ornl.gov/). Annual land cover products in China (CLCD) are freely available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4417810.