152
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Model identification and accuracy for estimation of suspended sediment load

, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 18520-18545 | Received 08 May 2022, Accepted 28 Oct 2022, Published online: 20 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

In the present study, three widely used modeling approaches: (1) sediment rating curve (SRC) and optimized OSRC, (2) machine learning models (ML) (random forest (RF) and Dagging-RF (DA-RF)) and (3) the semi-physically based soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) are applied to predict suspended sediment load (Qs) at the Talar watershed in Iran. Various graphical and quantitative methods were used to evaluate the goodness of fit. Results indicated that the RF model had the best prediction power in the training phase, while the dagging-RF hybrid algorithm outperformed all other models in the validation phase. The OSRC, RF and DA-RF had ‘very good’ performances based on the NSE in the validation phase, SRC showed ‘good’ performance, while the predicted values using SWAT were ‘satisfactory’. Our results suggest that the OSRC and ML models are more suitable for prediction of Qs in study catchments with poor data availability.

Graphical Abstract

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the I.R of Iran Meteorological Organization and the Mazandaran Regional Water Authority for providing datasets. The authors also acknowledge the support of Mrs. Yasaman Shokouhifar for her guidance and support during the implementation of SWAT, Dr. Maziar Mohammadi for sharing some of the datasets, Dr. Mohamad Ehteram for guidance on the use of the metaheuristic algorithm for the sediment rating curve optimization, and special thanks to Professor Karim C. Abbaspour for his review and comments which significantly enhanced the quality of the current paper.

Author’s contributions

Khabat Khosravi: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, writing - original draft, review and editing. Ali Golkarian: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, review and editing. Patricia M. Saco: Conceptualization, methodology, review and editing. Martijn J. Booij: Methodology, review and editing. Assefa Melesse: Conceptualization, supervision, review and editing

Data availability statement

Data shared with DOI of 10.4121/16685191 at https://figshare.com/s/e20fa8bbba586a173d1a

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Declarations

Not applicable

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Funding

Khabat Khosravi was partially supported by a grant from the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (No. FUM-1399102452809).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.