1,566
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Applicability of SWOT data in calibrating WRF-Hydro hydrological model over the Tawa River basin

&
Article: 2185292 | Received 11 Oct 2022, Accepted 22 Feb 2023, Published online: 06 Mar 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of study area representing study domain, Hoshangabad gauge station location, SWOT calibration and validation orbital pass over the Narmada River.

Figure 1. Map of study area representing study domain, Hoshangabad gauge station location, SWOT calibration and validation orbital pass over the Narmada River.

Table 1. WRF-Hydro calibration parameter, definition, and scaling factor ranges considered in calibration process.

Figure 2. Methodology flowchart for calibrating WRF-Hydro model using DDS algorithm.

Figure 2. Methodology flowchart for calibrating WRF-Hydro model using DDS algorithm.

Figure 3. WRF-Hydro model calibration performance using KGE for different normalized parameter values obtained by the best iteration of the DDS algorithm targeting the different discharge: (a) Qg, (b) Qgt, and (c) Qs. The x-axis represents the best model iteration, the left vertical axis represents the model performance by KGE, and the right vertical axis represents the normalized values of parameters selected by the DDS algorithm for calibrating the model. The normalized values of parameters have been shown to represent better parameter values having varied scales.

Figure 3. WRF-Hydro model calibration performance using KGE for different normalized parameter values obtained by the best iteration of the DDS algorithm targeting the different discharge: (a) Qg, (b) Qgt, and (c) Qs. The x-axis represents the best model iteration, the left vertical axis represents the model performance by KGE, and the right vertical axis represents the normalized values of parameters selected by the DDS algorithm for calibrating the model. The normalized values of parameters have been shown to represent better parameter values having varied scales.

Figure 4. Calibration of discharge with optimized Model-A, Model-B, and Model-C parameters for the (a) Event -1, (b) Event-2, and (c) Event-3 at Hoshangabad gauge station.

Figure 4. Calibration of discharge with optimized Model-A, Model-B, and Model-C parameters for the (a) Event -1, (b) Event-2, and (c) Event-3 at Hoshangabad gauge station.

Figure 5. Density curve of the percentage difference between time series Qg-Qgt and Qg-Qs. The density curve having an area equal to one represents the effect of SWOT TS alone (Qg-Qgt) and when combined with the uncertainty associated (Qg-Qs) over the KGE values in each iteration. The outlier has not been shown.

Figure 5. Density curve of the percentage difference between time series Qg-Qgt and Qg-Qs. The density curve having an area equal to one represents the effect of SWOT TS alone (Qg-Qgt) and when combined with the uncertainty associated (Qg-Qs) over the KGE values in each iteration. The outlier has not been shown.

Figure 6. Histogram of the percentage difference between Qg and monthly mean flow (MMF) i.e. (a) Qg-Model A, (b) Qg-Model B, (c) Qg-Model C and monthly peak flow i.e. (d) Qg-Model A, (e) Qg-Model B, (f) Qg-Model C for 2015-2017.

Figure 6. Histogram of the percentage difference between Qg and monthly mean flow (MMF) i.e. (a) Qg-Model A, (b) Qg-Model B, (c) Qg-Model C and monthly peak flow i.e. (d) Qg-Model A, (e) Qg-Model B, (f) Qg-Model C for 2015-2017.