Figures & data
Figure 1. Shows the expression of CD200 and CD56 in adult B-ALL case. The patient is positive for CD200 but negative for CD56.
![Figure 1. Shows the expression of CD200 and CD56 in adult B-ALL case. The patient is positive for CD200 but negative for CD56.](/cms/asset/c1891baa-7788-4d0a-b269-4c575d96a5bc/yhem_a_1404276_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1. Hematological and clinical data in CD200+ B-ALL patients vs. CD200− B-ALL patients.
Table 2. Hematological and bio-chemical data in CD56+ B-ALL vs. CD56− ALL patients.
Table 3. Cox regression analysis for prediction of OS in adult B-ALL cases.
Table 4. Cox regression analysis for prediction of DFS in adult B-ALL cases.
Figure 2. OS in CD200+ vs. CD200− B-ALL patients; the OS is shorter in CD200+ group as compared to CD200− one (p = 0.042).
![Figure 2. OS in CD200+ vs. CD200− B-ALL patients; the OS is shorter in CD200+ group as compared to CD200− one (p = 0.042).](/cms/asset/488d75d8-de79-486f-b789-7e5a055a81ea/yhem_a_1404276_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. DFS in CD200+ vs. CD200− B-ALL patients; the DFS is shorter in CD200+ group as compared to CD200− one (p = 0.006).
![Figure 3. DFS in CD200+ vs. CD200− B-ALL patients; the DFS is shorter in CD200+ group as compared to CD200− one (p = 0.006).](/cms/asset/5ef3a5d6-d169-4d45-9f4e-cd1aab09b7a3/yhem_a_1404276_f0003_b.gif)