Publication Cover
Stress
The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
Volume 23, 2020 - Issue 1
1,277
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Reports

Sex differences in heart rate responses to occupational stress

, , , , , & show all
Pages 13-18 | Received 08 Feb 2019, Accepted 15 May 2019, Published online: 30 May 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants.

Figure 1. Lowest average observed heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means. N = 23.

Figure 1. Lowest average observed heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means. N = 23.

Table 2. Observed HR (BPM) throughout work shift.

Figure 2. Highest average observed heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. Unpaired t-test revealed that resting HR values (mean = 83.2 BPM ± 7.8) significantly increased (p < .0001) throughout the shift (highest HR mean = 109.1 BPM ± 11.7) in all subjects. Both female (n = 7, p < .0001) and male (n = 16, p < .0001) subjects demonstrated a significant increase in HR. Two-way ANOVA indicated that female subjects demonstrated a significantly elevated highest HR compared with males (p = .03). Physical activity status did not influence the highest HR observed (p = .8). PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means.

Figure 2. Highest average observed heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. Unpaired t-test revealed that resting HR values (mean = 83.2 BPM ± 7.8) significantly increased (p < .0001) throughout the shift (highest HR mean = 109.1 BPM ± 11.7) in all subjects. Both female (n = 7, p < .0001) and male (n = 16, p < .0001) subjects demonstrated a significant increase in HR. Two-way ANOVA indicated that female subjects demonstrated a significantly elevated highest HR compared with males (p = .03). Physical activity status did not influence the highest HR observed (p = .8). PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means.

Figure 3. Average change (A) and percent change (B) in heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. Two-way ANOVA revealed that females had a larger change in HR throughout a work shift compared with males (, p = .05), however, physical activity status did not modulate this change (p = .94). Females had a larger percent change in HR throughout a work shift compared with males (, p = .03) while physical activity had no effect (p = .96). PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means.

Figure 3. Average change (A) and percent change (B) in heart rate (HR) during a work shift in subjects. Two-way ANOVA revealed that females had a larger change in HR throughout a work shift compared with males (Figure 3(A), p = .05), however, physical activity status did not modulate this change (p = .94). Females had a larger percent change in HR throughout a work shift compared with males (Figure 3(B), p = .03) while physical activity had no effect (p = .96). PA = physically active; Not PA = not physically active. Bars are means ± standard deviations of the means.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.