Publication Cover
Stress
The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
Volume 26, 2023 - Issue 1
687
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

CCK1R2R-/- ameliorates myocardial damage caused by unpredictable stress via altering fatty acid metabolism

, , , , , & show all
Article: 2254566 | Received 07 Apr 2023, Accepted 27 Aug 2023, Published online: 08 Sep 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Unpredictable stress-induced heart dysfunction.

Figure 1. Unpredictable stress-induced heart dysfunction.

Figure 2. Unpredictable stress causes inflammation and apoptosis.

(A) The levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in the left ventricle of mice were measured by ELISA. (B) Representative confocal images of TUNEL (red) and DAPI (blue) in heart samples from WT and WT + ST mice (scale bar, 50 µm). Results are displayed as mean ± SD (n = 6). **p < 0.01. TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha; IL-6, Interleukin-6; ELISA, enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay; TUNEL, TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; WT, wild type; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; SD, Standard deviation.
Figure 2. Unpredictable stress causes inflammation and apoptosis.

Figure 3. CCK and CCKR were upregulated after unpredictable stress.

(A) Real-time PCR and western blot were used to detect the expression of CCK1R and CCK2R. (B) The CCK content in left ventricle of WT or WT + ST mice. Results are showed as mean ± SD (n = 6). **p < 0.01. CCK, cholecystokinin; CCKR, cholecystokinin receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CCK1R, cholecystokinin A receptor; CCK2R, cholecystokinin B receptor; WT, wild type; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; SD, Standard deviation.
Figure 3. CCK and CCKR were upregulated after unpredictable stress.

Figure 4. Cardiac function and myocardial injury were ameliorated in CCK1R2R-/- mice.

Figure 4. Cardiac function and myocardial injury were ameliorated in CCK1R2R-/- mice.

Figure 5. Oxidative stress and inflammation were decreased in CCK1R2R-/- mice.

Figure 5. Oxidative stress and inflammation were decreased in CCK1R2R-/- mice.

Figure 6. Overall identification of differential metabolites.

(A) A heat map was used to show the overall metabolic profile differences (red, up-regulated; blue, down-regulated). Each row was a metabolite, and each column was a sample. (B) The number of common and unique differential metabolites in different comparison groups was counted by Venn diagram. (C) Statistics of different expressed metabolites. The red column represented upregulation, and the blue column represented downregulation.
Figure 6. Overall identification of differential metabolites.

Figure 7. Analysis of differential metabolites between different groups.

(A) Heatmap of differentially expressed metabolites in the left ventricular tissue in WT + ST mice compared to the WT mice, in CCK1R2R-/- mice compared to the WT mice, in CCK1R2R-/-+ST mice compared to the CCK1R2R-/- mice, in CCK1R2R-/-+ST mice compared to the WT + ST mice (red, up-regulated; blue, down-regulated). Each row was a metabolite, and each column was a sample. (B) The difference between groups was shown in volcano plot. WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; WT, wild type; CCK1R2R-/-, cholecystokinin A receptor and cholecystokinin B receptor knockout; CCK1R2R-/-+ST mice, CCK1R2R-/- mice stimulated by unpredictable stress.
Figure 7. Analysis of differential metabolites between different groups.

Figure 8. The relative amounts of metabolites (WT vs WT + ST; WT vs CCK1R2R-/-) is shown in Z-score plot.

WT, wild type; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; CCK1R2R-/-, cholecystokinin A receptor and cholecystokinin B receptor knockout.
Figure 8. The relative amounts of metabolites (WT vs WT + ST; WT vs CCK1R2R-/-) is shown in Z-score plot.

Figure 9. The relative amounts of metabolites (CCK1R2R-/- vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST; WT + ST vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST) is shown in Z-score plot.

CCK1R2R-/-, cholecystokinin A receptor and cholecystokinin B receptor knockout; CCK1R2R-/-+ST mice, CCK1R2R-/- mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress.
Figure 9. The relative amounts of metabolites (CCK1R2R-/- vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST; WT + ST vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST) is shown in Z-score plot.

Figure 10. Differential metabolite pathway analysis (WT vs WT + ST; WT vs CCK1R2R-/-).

(A) Histogram. (B) Network planning. WT, wild type; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; CCK1R2R-/-, cholecystokinin A receptor and cholecystokinin B receptor knockout.
Figure 10. Differential metabolite pathway analysis (WT vs WT + ST; WT vs CCK1R2R-/-).

Figure 11. Differential metabolite pathway analysis (CCK1R2R-/- vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST; WT + ST vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST).

(A) Histogram. (B) Network planning. CCK1R2R-/-, cholecystokinin A receptor and cholecystokinin B receptor knockout; CCK1R2R-/-+ST mice, CCK1R2R-/- mice stimulated by unpredictable stress; WT + ST mice, wild type mice stimulated by unpredictable stress.
Figure 11. Differential metabolite pathway analysis (CCK1R2R-/- vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST; WT + ST vs CCK1R2R-/-+ST).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (75.5 KB)