Publication Cover
Stress
The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
Volume 12, 2009 - Issue 4
830
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The effect of parabolic flight on perceived physical, motivational and psychological state in men and women: Correlation with neuroendocrine stress parameters and electrocortical activity

, , , , , & show all
Pages 336-349 | Received 07 Apr 2008, Accepted 23 Sep 2008, Published online: 23 Nov 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flight procedure. After take off, prior to parabola zero, EEG recording, blood collection and assessment of mood state took place. EEG recording was repeated after parabolas 10, 20 and 30. Blood collection and mood assessment were repeated after parabolas 5, 15 and 25. Thirty minutes post-flight another data set of EEG, blood and mood data were collected. Each of the 31 parabolas is marked by two hyper-gravity phases (dark grey) and a zero-gravity phase (light grey).

Figure 1 Flight procedure. After take off, prior to parabola zero, EEG recording, blood collection and assessment of mood state took place. EEG recording was repeated after parabolas 10, 20 and 30. Blood collection and mood assessment were repeated after parabolas 5, 15 and 25. Thirty minutes post-flight another data set of EEG, blood and mood data were collected. Each of the 31 parabolas is marked by two hyper-gravity phases (dark grey) and a zero-gravity phase (light grey).

Figure 2 Perceived physical state (A), motivational state (B), psychological strain (C), physical energy (D), physical health (E), self-confidence (F), calmness (G), willingness to seek contact (H) and relaxation (I) for measurements nos. 1–4 in-flight and measurement no. 5 30 min post-flight. Data show means (small box), standard error (large box) and standard deviation (bar). Stars indicate significant changes (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) followed by: 1 different to 1st measurement, 2 different to 2nd measurement, 3 different to 3rd measurement, 4 different to fourth measurement, 5 different to fifth measurement.

Figure 2 Perceived physical state (A), motivational state (B), psychological strain (C), physical energy (D), physical health (E), self-confidence (F), calmness (G), willingness to seek contact (H) and relaxation (I) for measurements nos. 1–4 in-flight and measurement no. 5 30 min post-flight. Data show means (small box), standard error (large box) and standard deviation (bar). Stars indicate significant changes (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) followed by: 1 different to 1st measurement, 2 different to 2nd measurement, 3 different to 3rd measurement, 4 different to fourth measurement, 5 different to fifth measurement.

Figure 3 Progression of plasma hormone concentrations from baseline through parabolic flight to post-flight measurements (first to sixth for (A) ACTH, (B) COR, (C) prolactin; and from first to seventh samples for (D) epinephrine, (E) norepinephrine, and (F) NOR/EP ratiosI). Data show means ± 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate significant changes (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) followed by: 1 versus first measurement, 2 versus second measurement, 3 versus third measurement, 4 versus fourth measurement, 5 versus fifth measurement, 6 versus sixth measurement.

Figure 3 Progression of plasma hormone concentrations from baseline through parabolic flight to post-flight measurements (first to sixth for (A) ACTH, (B) COR, (C) prolactin; and from first to seventh samples for (D) epinephrine, (E) norepinephrine, and (F) NOR/EP ratiosI). Data show means ± 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate significant changes (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) followed by: 1 versus first measurement, 2 versus second measurement, 3 versus third measurement, 4 versus fourth measurement, 5 versus fifth measurement, 6 versus sixth measurement.

Figure 4 Standardised low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) differences in the EEG β1 frequency band during parabolic flight. Comparisons of (A) pre-flight activity and in-flight activity, and (B) in-flight activity and post-flight activity (B), respectively. Images depicting SPMs seen from different perspectives are based on voxel-by-voxel t-values of differences. Red colours indicate increased activity in the in-flight condition (A). Blue colours indicate decreased activity in the post-flight condition. Changes were found to be localised in the frontal lobe and medial frontal gyrus. Structural anatomy is shown in grey scale (L left, R right, A anterior, P posterior).

Figure 4 Standardised low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) differences in the EEG β1 frequency band during parabolic flight. Comparisons of (A) pre-flight activity and in-flight activity, and (B) in-flight activity and post-flight activity (B), respectively. Images depicting SPMs seen from different perspectives are based on voxel-by-voxel t-values of differences. Red colours indicate increased activity in the in-flight condition (A). Blue colours indicate decreased activity in the post-flight condition. Changes were found to be localised in the frontal lobe and medial frontal gyrus. Structural anatomy is shown in grey scale (L left, R right, A anterior, P posterior).

Figure 5 Correlations between subjective mood assessment and plasma hormone concentrations during parabolic flight. (A) cortisol (COR [μg/dl]); (B) ACTH [pmol/l]; (C) prolactin (PRL [ng/ml]); (D) epinephrine (EPI [ng/l]); (E) norepinephrine (NOR [ng/l]), and perceived physical state (PEPS, left column), psychological strain (PSYCHO, middle column) and motivational state (MOT, right column). Solid line represents linear regression, dotted lines 95% confidence intervals. All correlations, except those with NOR/PEPS (D, column 1; p = 0.08), were significant (p < 0.05).

Figure 5 Correlations between subjective mood assessment and plasma hormone concentrations during parabolic flight. (A) cortisol (COR [μg/dl]); (B) ACTH [pmol/l]; (C) prolactin (PRL [ng/ml]); (D) epinephrine (EPI [ng/l]); (E) norepinephrine (NOR [ng/l]), and perceived physical state (PEPS, left column), psychological strain (PSYCHO, middle column) and motivational state (MOT, right column). Solid line represents linear regression, dotted lines 95% confidence intervals. All correlations, except those with NOR/PEPS (D, column 1; p = 0.08), were significant (p < 0.05).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.