Figures & data
Figure 1. Mean (and SEM) of odor hedonic ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Odor hedonic ratings were rated on a visual analogic scale from −9 to +9. Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
![Figure 1. Mean (and SEM) of odor hedonic ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Odor hedonic ratings were rated on a visual analogic scale from −9 to +9. Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/7e92b5dc-c0c3-44a4-b959-eb51bf1f6d8e/ynns_a_2145425_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. Mean (and SEM) of odor hedonic ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Odor hedonic ratings were rated on a visual analogic scale from −9 to +9. Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
![Figure 2. Mean (and SEM) of odor hedonic ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Odor hedonic ratings were rated on a visual analogic scale from −9 to +9. Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/32e2b33b-a758-4a38-ae01-22a72a8a698e/ynns_a_2145425_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. Mean (and SEM) of odor intensity ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 3. Mean (and SEM) of odor intensity ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/cd545193-b448-4f5d-b34f-e95f32713414/ynns_a_2145425_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. Mean (and SEM) of odor intensity ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 4. Mean (and SEM) of odor intensity ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using * p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/4ddc9a79-f9f5-454b-9081-666cf9599788/ynns_a_2145425_f0004_ob.jpg)
Figure 5. Mean (and SEM) of odor edibility ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 5. Mean (and SEM) of odor edibility ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), in each diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/73e438fc-35e2-4cb1-8ed2-e6bf473488ef/ynns_a_2145425_f0005_ob.jpg)
Figure 6. Mean (and SEM) of odor edibility ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 6. Mean (and SEM) of odor edibility ratings for meat odor (A), vegetable odors (B), other food odors (C), and non-food odors (D), independently of diet. Error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were noted using *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/2ba7cfd2-a3f5-4cd8-a154-3af4054f199b/ynns_a_2145425_f0006_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Spearman correlations for Hedonicity/Intensity, Hedonicity/Edibility, and Intensity/Edibility for each diet and each odor category.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.