Abstract
In the twenty-first century, culture has become a valuable resource for European countries, particularly those with abundant cultural heritage, as is the case in Southern European countries such as Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece. This is why cultural policy in these countries has experienced two decades of expansion and, to some extent, convergence with other European countries. Thus, can we still speak about a cultural policy model in the South of Europe? Based on qualitative and quantitative analyses, we show that these countries still have their own cultural policy model but that, after the global economic crisis in 2008, the trend towards the European convergence of this public policy has stopped.
Notes
1. Research on cultural policy has significantly developed over the past decade, both at the conceptual level – although without consolidating a single perspective that balances political-science focuses with other approaches closer to cultural studies (Gray Citation2010) – as well as at the methodological and empirical levels (Dubois Citation1999). The analysis of cultural policy in Spain has developed considerably (Rubio Arostegui Citation2003; Barbieri Citation2012; Villarroya Citation2012; Rius-Ulldemolins and Rubio Citation2013; Rubio Arostegui, Rius-Ulldemollins, and Martinez Citation2014; Rius-Ulldemolins, Flor Moreno, and Hernàndez i Martí Citation2017), especially in terms of its internal cultural diversity and the dynamics of urban policy; in Italy, cultural management and its efficiency is intensely debated (Fedeli and Santoni Citation2006; Slavich and Montanari Citation2009; Montalto Citation2010; Zan et al. Citation2012). Cultural policies in the other countries analysed (Greece and Portugal) have received less attention. Among the critical analyses published about Portugal, its institutional organisation, influence on urban development, and post-colonial ties, stand out (Balsas Citation2004; Fishman and Lizardo Citation2013; Garcia et al. Citation2016; Vargas, Sarmento, and Oliveira Citation2017). Finally, analyses of Greece focus on its limited development and centralised character, as well as its historical links to the Olympic Games (Konsola Citation1988, 1999; Zorba Citation2009).
2. This article does not focus on the processes of cooperation or convergence of cultural policy patterns in different European countries as it has been analysed by Sassatelli (Sassatelli Citation2002, 2007), but rather, we address the basic small and large-scale details of the convergence or divergence from the European reference models, such as the Central European Model or the Anglo-Saxon Model, in Southern European countries (Mulcahy Citation1998; Dubois Citation2016). The deeper aspects of ‘how to do things’ in cultural politics is an interesting subject; some specific aspects of it, such as relationships with cultural agencies, have been studied according to diverse models (Rius-Ulldemolins and Rubio Citation2013), but it would be impossible to approach this topic here in this article because of its complexity and the lack of current and complete comparative studies.
3. A more extensive comparison of Southern European countries, including countries in former Yugoslavia, or even Turkey or countries which have extensively developed their cultural policies – as seen in their Compendium reports or in articles published in international cultural policy journals (Shoup, Bonini Baraldi, and Zan Citation2014; Aksoy and Şeyben Citation2015) – would have been desirable. However, the inclusion of these countries, with their different historical and cultural trajectories and recent inclusion in the European area – or its current distancing in the case of Turkey (Boşnak Citation2016) – would have overcomplicated these comparisons and would have introduced excessive heterogeneity into this article, which concentrates on analysing the definition of certain common patterns that define a Southern European cultural policy model. It would also be interesting to include Eastern European countries in a future comparative analysis, which would start by using data from the Compendium and studies on these countries (Vos Citation2017). This objective is beyond the scope of this article, but without doubt, in the future it would be interesting to undertake further, more focussed, comparative research into the cases of these countries.
4. In the case of Portugal, the data come from the Ministry of Culture/General Secretariat and the Secretary of State for Culture/Strategic Administration, Cultural Planning and Evaluation and for cultural spending, from the General Account of the State. Regarding territorial administrations, our source was the National Institute of Statistics and the Survey on the Public Financing of Cultural, Creative, and Sporting Activities in the Municipalities (2013–2014).
5. In every case, the data and observations we provide were contrasted with the literature available in the national statistical institutes and in publications in specialised academic cultural policy journals such as the International Journal of Cultural Policy, Cultural Trends, the Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society City, or Culture and Society.
Gray, Clive. 2010. “Analysing Cultural Policy: Incorrigibly Plural or Ontologically Incompatible?” International Journal of Cultural Policy 16 (2) ( 05/01; 2014/03): 215–230.10.1080/10286630902935160 Dubois, Vincent. 1999. La politique culturelle. Genèse d’une catégorie d’intervention publique. Paris: Belin. Rubio Arostegui, Juan Arturo. 2003. La política cultural del Estado en los gobiernos socialistas: 1982–1996. Gijón: Trea. Barbieri, Nicolás. 2012. “Why Does Cultural Policy Change? Policy Discourse and Policy Subsystem: A Case Study of the Evolution of Cultural Policy in Catalonia.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (1): 13–30.10.1080/10286632.2011.567329 Villarroya, Anna. 2012. “Cultural Policies and National Identity in Catalonia.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (1): 31–45.10.1080/10286632.2011.567330 Rius-Ulldemolins, Joaquim, and Arturo Rubio. 2013. “The Governance of National Cultural Organisations: Comparative Study of Performance Contracts with the Main Cultural Organisations in England, France and Catalonia (Spain).” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (2): 249–269.10.1080/10286632.2011.638981 Rubio Arostegui, Juan Arturo, Joaquim Rius-Ulldemollins, and Santi Martinez. 2014. El modelo español de financiación de las artes y la cultura en el contexto europeo. Crisis económica, cambio institucional, gobernanza y valor público de la cultura y la política cultural. Madrid: Fundación Alternativas. Rius-Ulldemolins, Joaquim, Vicent Flor Moreno, and Gil-Manuel Hernàndez i Martí. 2017. “The Dark Side of Cultural Policy: Economic and Political Instrumentalisation, White Elephants, and Corruption in Valencian Cultural Institutions.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (3) ( 02/22): 1–16.10.1080/10286632.2017.1296434 Fedeli, Silvia, and Michele Santoni. 2006. “The Government’s Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums.” Journal of Cultural Economics 30 (1): 41–72.10.1007/s10824-006-9005-8 Slavich, Barbara, and Fabrizio Montanari. 2009. “New Trends of Managerial Roles in Performing Arts: Empirical Evidence from the Italian Context.” Cultural Trends 18 (3) ( 09/01): 227–237.10.1080/09548960903065261 Montalto, Valentina. 2010. “Decentralization and Devolution in Italian Cultural Policies: How Micro-Practices Should Inspire Macro-Policies.” Cultural Trends 19 (1–2) ( 06/01): 15–25.10.1080/09548961003695957 Zan, Luca, Sara Bonini Baraldi, Paolo Ferri, Maria Lusiani, and Marcello M. Mariani. 2012. “Behind the Scenes of Public Funding for Performing Arts in Italy: Hidden Phenomena beyond the Rhetoric of Legislation.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (1) ( 01/01): 76–92.10.1080/10286632.2011.573849 Balsas, Carlos J. L. 2004. “City Centre Regeneration in the Context of the 2001 European Capital of Culture in Porto, Portugal.” Local Economy 19 (4): 396–410.10.1080/0269094042000286873 Fishman, Robert M., and Omar Lizardo. 2013. “How Macro-Historical Change Shapes Cultural Taste: Legacies of Democratization in Spain and Portugal.” American Sociological Review 78 (2) ( April 01): 213–239.10.1177/0003122413478816 Garcia, José Luís, João Teixeira Lopes, Teresa Duarte Martinho, José Soares Neves, Rui Telmo Gomes, and Vera Borges. 2016. “Mapping Cultural Policy in Portugal: From Incentives to Crisis.” International Journal of Cultural Policy ( 11/06): 1–17.10.1080/10286632.2016.1248950 Vargas, Carlos, Cristina Sarmento, and Patricia Oliveira. 2017. “Cultural Networks between Portugal and Brazil: A Postcolonial Review.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 23 (3) ( 05/04): 300–311.10.1080/10286632.2015.1056175 Zorba, Myrsini. 2009. “Conceptualizing Greek Cultural Policy: The Non-Democratization of Public Culture.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 15 (3) ( 08/01): 245–259.10.1080/10286630802621522 Mulcahy, Kevin. 1998. “Cultural Patronage in Comparative Perspective: Public Support for the Arts in France, Germany, Norway, and Canada.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 27 (4): 247–263.10.1080/10632929809597270 Dubois, Vincent. 2016. “The ‘French Model’ and Its ‘Crisi’: Ambitions, Ambituities and Challenges of Cultural Policy.” Debats. Journal on Culture, Power and Society Annual Review 1: 81–97. Rius-Ulldemolins, Joaquim, and Arturo Rubio. 2013. “The Governance of National Cultural Organisations: Comparative Study of Performance Contracts with the Main Cultural Organisations in England, France and Catalonia (Spain).” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (2): 249–269.10.1080/10286632.2011.638981 Shoup, Daniel David, Sara Bonini Baraldi, and Luca Zan. 2014. “A Centralized Decentralization: Outsourcing in the Turkish Cultural Heritage Sector.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 20 (1) ( 01/01): 54–77.10.1080/10286632.2012.731051 Aksoy, Asu, and Burcu Yasemin Şeyben. 2015. “Storm over the State Cultural Institutions: New Cultural Policy Direction in Turkey.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 21 (2) ( 03/15; 2015/03): 183–199.10.1080/10286632.2014.890605 Boşnak, Büke. 2016. “Europeanisation and De-Europeanisation Dynamics in Turkey: The Case of Environmental Organisations.” South European Society and Politics 21 (1) ( 01/02): 75–90.10.1080/13608746.2016.1151476 Vos, Claske. 2017. “European Integration through ‘Soft Conditionality’. the Contribution of Culture to EU Enlargement in Southeast Europe.” International Journal of Cultural Policy ( 01/09): 1–15.