ABSTRACT
This paper is grounded in a rancorous debate in built-heritage studies concerning heritage policies and the disputes associated with them. Despite the seeming dominance of architectural considerations in decision-making about heritage protection, factual evidence from previous studies shows that not one, but five factors are involved, in differing doses, in the decisions made by planning bodies: architecture and design, city-planning, social considerations, economics, and property-related considerations. This paper categorizes each of these elements and frames them in a new conceptual framework. . The framework analyses the five factors from the perspectives of two prisms: support or opposition to heritage protection policies. Through a prominent case-example of Tel Aviv’s conservation plan, we then demonstrate that the new conceptual framework can be utilized to better understand the multifaceted debates – overt or covert – surrounding heritage protection. The case study and the conceptual framework suggest that although urban form and design issues are quite dominant, other non-physical considerations shape the dynamics of conflicts, practices, and policies surrounding heritage protection.
Acknowledgment
We thank the reviewers and the editor for their invaluable contribution and comments throughout the peer review process.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Nir Mualam
Nir Mualam is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology. He is an experienced lawyer and a planner who practiced land use law and heritage protection before pursuing an academic career. His current research focuses on heritage policies and conflicts, planning processes, and planning institutions.
Rachelle Alterman
Rachelle Alterman is a professor (emerita, non-retired) in the Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, and a senior fellow at the Neaman Institute for Policy Research. She is the founding president of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law, and Property Rights; the co-founder of the Platform of Experts in Planning Law; and an honorary member of the Association of European Schools of Planning.