858
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inspections, reviews, inquiries and recommendations pertaining to youth justice centres in New South Wales between 2015 and 2021

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 255-274 | Published online: 07 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

It is widely recognised that there is a lack of analysis of criminal justice policy-making (and youth justice policy-making specifically) within the wider criminological project. To partially address the gap, this article focuses on one part of the dynamic and complex policy-making environment—reviews, inquiries and findings of oversight bodies between 2015 and 2021 relevant to youth detention in New South Wales (NSW). We estimate that the reports arising from these inquiries and reviews have generated approximately 1040 recommendations (approximately 590 relevant to Youth Justice NSW (YJNSW) broadly and 284 relevant to youth justice centres more specifically). The sheer volume of recommendations, some of which are very broad, raises questions about the ability of an agency, such as YJNSW, to implement them; about which recommendations might be prioritised; and how YJNSW might resolve conflicts between recommendations arising from different and often parallel processes. We suggest that, for the purposes of achieving the best outcomes for young people in custody, there might be greater merit in having fewer inquiries that deal with parts of youth detention and a coordinated and prioritised response to recommendations to address issues of youth detention.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Elaine Fishwick for her helpful feedback on a previous draft of this paper and to the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Legislation and international conventions

Advocate for Children and Young People Act 2014 (NSW)

Children (Detention Centres) Act 1987 (NSW)

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (United Nations Citation1989)

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (United Nations 1985) (the Beijing Rules)

Notes

1 See, for example, reports such as: Amnesty International Australia, Citation2018, ‘The sky is the limit: Keeping young children out of prison by raising the age of criminal responsibility’; Australian Child Rights Taskforce (ACRT), Citation2018, ‘The children's report: Australia's NGO coalition report to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child’; and the Change the Record Coalition, Citation2017, ‘Free to be kids: National plan of action’ report, amongst others.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 312.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.