165
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pluralism, peoplehood and political theology in international legal scholarship

ORCID Icon
Pages 77-98 | Published online: 20 Aug 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The versions of ‘political theology’ articulated by Schmitt and Benjamin, and in more recent times by Agamben, have been of substantial influence on debate in international legal scholarship. The standpoint adopted here is the project of a collective and pluralist analysis of public international law. It is argued that while Agamben’s writings have the potential to contribute to this project, available appropriations of Agamben’s influential claims regarding sovereignty, ‘bare life’ and the ‘state of exception’ are inadequate in this respect. The role played by ‘peoplehood’ both illustrates and contributes to the conceptual difficulties within the present debate. Ways forward for the scholarship of international law include a more discriminating appropriation of Agamben which would attempt to decouple a potentially pluralist and collectivist Agamben from a biopolitics- and state-focused Agamben. This would be to go beyond ‘the kingdom’ and possibly, beyond ‘political theology’.

Acknowledgements

This paper was written at the Melbourne Law School’s Institute for International Law and the Humanities during a period of research leave generously awarded by the Faculty of Business and Law, Deakin University. I wish to thank in particular Sundhya Pahuja and IILAH colleagues for continuing support and encouragement. Thanks go to Antal Berkes, Jean D’Aspremont, John Haskell and Iain Scobbie of the Manchester International Law Centre where an early version was presented in June 2017. At Deakin and beyond my thanks go to Helmut Aust, Claudio Bozzi, George Duke, Zim Nwokora, Matthew Sharpe, Luca Siliquini-Cinelli, Marcelo Svirsky and Ozlem Ulgen. Editors of and referees for the Griffith Law Review deserve thanks for their generosity. All residual errors are mine.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributors

John R Morss is Senior Lecturer in International Law, Deakin Law School, Victoria, Australia.

Notes

1 Morss (Citation2013).

2 Koskenniemi (Citation2005), p 71.

3 Brown (Citation2015), p 21.

4 Koskenniemi (Citation2005), p 90.

5 Koskenniemi (Citation2005), p 156.

6 Rawls (Citation1999), p 60.

7 Scheuerman (Citation1999).

8 Croce (Citation2011), p 43.

9 Dyzenhaus (Citation2017), p 55.

10 Fusco (Citation2017), p 138.

11 Augsberg (Citation2010); Howse (Citation2016); Johns (Citation2005); Nicholson (Citation2016).

12 Farrier and Tuitt (Citation2013), p 268.

13 Fusco (Citation2017), p 133.

14 McLoughlin (Citation2016a), p 511.

15 Howse (Citation2016), pp 212, 229, 230.

16 Bignall (Citation2012), pp 261, 269.

17 Bignall (Citation2012), p 281,279.

18 Anghie (Citation2005), p 314.

19 Anghie (Citation2016), pp 159, 160; postcolonial scholarship in public international law is discussed by Morss (Citation2013), p 51.

20 Crawford (Citation2001), p 10.

21 Bignall (Citation2012), pp 280–1.

22 Brown (Citation2015), p 21.

23 Crawford (Citation2001).

24 Sands (Citation2016).

25 Kennedy (Citation2011), p 336; Seran (Citation2015), p 672.

26 An ur-separation between zoe and bios has left such marks on what elsewhere Agamben has called the ‘collective unconscious’: Agamben (Citation2016), p 208; Agamben (Citation1998), p 105.

27 Von Bernstorff (Citation2016), pp 192, 201.

28 Buchanan (Citation2004), p 69.

29 See Tierney (Citation2007).

30 Critchley (Citation2014), p 62.

31 Butler (Citation2015), p 182; Butler (Citation2016), p 61.

32 Brown (Citation2015), p 18.

33 Aristodemou (Citation2015); Nicholson (Citation2017).

34 Oklopcic (Citation2018).

35 Waldron (Citation2006); Prozorov (Citation2009).

36 Waldron (Citation2012); Capps (Citation2009).

37 Anghie (Citation2005), p 314.

38 Anghie (Citation2005), p 315.

39 Douzinas (Citation2006), pp 35, 38.

40 Staubach (Citation2016), pp 113, 125.

41 Tesòn (Citation2016).

42 Koskenniemi (Citation2005), p 90.

43 Koskenniemi (Citation2005), p 99.

44 Pettit (Citation2012), p 13; Horton (Citation2010), p 21.

45 Capps (Citation2009), p 172.

46 Badiou et al (Citation2016).

47 Johns (Citation2005), p 626.

48 Agamben (Citation2000), p 138; here an idiosyncratic usage of the term ‘body politic’ is also to be found.

49 Schmitt (Citation2005), p 36.

50 Schmitt (Citation2005), p 34.

51 McLoughlin (Citation2016a), p 509.

52 Crawford (Citation2012); significantly, one of the grounds on which Schmitt criticised Kelsen was Kelsen’s nominalist proposal to do away with sovereignty as a concept: Schmitt (Citation2005), p 21.

53 Crawford (Citation2014), p 88.

54 Crawford (Citation2014), p 113.

55 Waldron (Citation2006), p 21.

56 Aust (Citation2015).

57 Scheuerman (Citation1999), p 124.

58 Lindahl (Citation2007), p 9.

59 Schmitt (Citation2004).

60 Croce (Citation2011) pp 47, 52 (emphasis in original).

61 Croce (Citation2011), p 57; Vinx (Citation2013), p 98.

62 Strong (Citation2005), xv.

63 Strong (Citation2005), xiii.

64 Reynolds (Citation2017).

65 Agamben (Citation2016), p 112.

66 Agamben (Citation2009), p 83.

67 Agamben (Citation1998), p 6.

68 Orford (Citation2006), p 183.

69 Johns (Citation2005), p 633; also see Derrida (Citation2009), p 325.

70 Agamben (Citation1998), p 90.

71 Agamben (Citation2016), p 208.

72 Agamben (Citation2016), p 263.

73 Agamben (Citation2016), p 263.

74 Agamben (Citation2009), p 110.

75 Agamben (Citation2009), pp 102, 126.

76 Agamben (Citation2009), p 89.

77 Agamben (Citation2009), p 83.

78 Agamben (Citation2009), p 89.

79 Mills (Citation2008), p 60.

80 Agamben (Citation2009), p 32.

81 Agamben (Citation2009), p 80.

82 Agamben (Citation2009), p 90.

83 Agamben (Citation2009), p 98.

84 Agamben (Citation2009), p 98.

85 Agamben (Citation2016), p 111.

86 Agamben (Citation2016), p 266.

87 Agamben criticises Benjamin for his messianic, revelatory style: Agamben (Citation1999), p 163; Agamben’s ‘apocalyptic tone’ is criticised by political theorists Hardt and Negri: McLoughlin (Citation2012), p 681.

88 Humphreys (Citation2006), p 683.

89 Siliquini-Cinelli (Citation2015), p 690.

90 Agamben (Citation2016), p 263.

91 Agamben (Citation2016), p 263.

92 Agamben (Citation2016), p 2.

93 Derrida with unwonted asperity questions Agamben’s reliance on the sharp distinction of bios and zoe, this ‘airtight frontier along which Agamben constructs his whole discourse’: Derrida (Citation2009), p 321.

94 Fitzpatrick (Citation2005), p 65.

95 Agamben (Citation2013), p 38; Agamben (Citation2000), p 67.

96 Fitzpatrick (Citation2005), p 55.

97 Fitzpatrick (Citation2005), p 49.

98 Agamben (Citation2016), p 209; Fitzpatrick (Citation2005), p 52; Agamben has been accused of misreading Hobbes: Pavlich (Citation2010), p 31.

99 Agamben (Citation2016), p 213.

100 Agamben (Citation2016), p 209.

101 Agamben (Citation2016), p 209

102 Agamben (Citation1998), p 8 (emphasis in original).

103 Agamben (Citation1998), p 82.

104 Whyte (Citation2012), pp 239, 247.

105 Whyte (Citation2012), p 252.

106 Farrier and Tuitt, (2013), p 258.

107 Farrier and Tuitt (Citation2013), p 268.

108 Farrier and Tuitt (Citation2013), p 265.

109 Tuitt and Fitzpatrick (Citation2004), xii; Bignall and Svirsky (Citation2012), p 3; it should be noted that Agamben warns against aestheticisation, Agamben (Citation2011), p 198.

110 Johns (Citation2005), p 35.

111 McLoughlin (Citation2016b), p 4.

112 Mills (Citation2008), p 137.

113 Whyte (Citation2013), p 144.

114 Whyte (Citation2013), p 14.

115 Bignall (Citation2016), p 49; Pavlich (Citation2010), p 31.

116 Prozorov (Citation2014), p 3.

117 Siliquini-Cinelli (Citation2015), p 701.

118 Agamben (Citation2017), p 38 (emphasis in original).

119 Utter difference may be codified by a very small change, see Agamben (Citation1993), p 53; a quantum leap is after all an extremely small leap.

120 Agamben (Citation2005), p xi.

121 Agamben (Citation2017), p 9.

122 Agamben (Citation2000), p 141; Agamben (Citation1993), p 44; Agamben (Citation2011), p 251.

123 Bignall (Citation2016), p 51.

124 Bignall and Svirsky (Citation2012), p 12.

125 Agamben (Citation1993), p 71; it should be noted that for Derrida, each ‘people’ can be said to be a proper name: De Ville (Citation2010), p 65.

126 Agamben (Citation1993), p 9.

127 Agamben (Citation1993), p10.

128 Agamben (Citation1993), p 1.

129 Prozorov (Citation2014), p 6.

130 Agamben (Citation1993), p 65.

131 Agamben (Citation1993), p 32; now see Stangneth (Citation2014).

132 Agamben (Citation1993), p 24.

133 Bignall (Citation2012), p 277.

134 Agamben (Citation1993), p 1, 6, 24, 44 for examples.

135 Svirsky (Citation2012), p 52.

136 Agamben (Citation2000), p

137 Zartaloudis (Citation2010), p 110

138 Agamben (Citation2000), p 35.

139 Agamben (Citation2000), p 32.

140 Agamben (Citation2000), p 66.

141 Agamben (Citation2016), p 211; Agamben (Citation2011), p 246.

142 Adam Smith developed an analysis of human economic activity explicitly based on every person’s reliance on others. For Smith, everyone ‘stands at all times in need of the cooperation and assistance of great multitudes’: Ronge (Citation2017), p 287.

143 Agamben (Citation2000), p 142 (emphasis in original).

144 Agamben (Citation1993), p 83.

145 Agamben (Citation1993), p 80.

146 Agamben (Citation2000), p 110 (emphasis in original).

147 Agamben (Citation2000), p 68.

148 Agamben (Citation2000), p 140.

149 Nootens (Citation2015), p 139.

150 Bignall (Citation2016), p 55.

151 Agamben (Citation2013), p 58.

152 Agamben (Citation2011), p xii.

153 Agamben (Citation2011), p xiii.

154 Agamben (Citation2011), p 259.

155 Agamben (Citation2011), p 259.

156 Whyte (Citation2012), p 255; Whyte’s reference is to the restoration of the Haiti slave-owners’ rights and practices after Napoleon’s suppression of the rebellion.

157 Agamben (Citation2011), p 257.

158 Agamben (Citation2011), p 66.

159 Agamben (Citation2011), p 251 (emphasis added).

160 Bignall (Citation2016), p 54 (emphasis in original).

161 Agamben (Citation2011), p 1.

162 Agamben (Citation2011), p xii.

163 Agamben (Citation2017), p 17; Agamben (Citation2018), p 83.

164 Agamben (Citation2010), p 43.

165 De Sutter and McGee (Citation2012); Augsberg (Citation2010), p 753.

166 Fitzpatrick (Citation2005), p 64.

167 Agamben (Citation1999), p 170.

168 McLoughlin (Citation2016a), p 511.

169 Aristodemou (Citation2015), p 38.

170 Agamben (Citation2000), p 32.

171 Butler (Citation2015), p 159.

172 Butler (Citation2015), p 227.

173 Vinx (Citation2013), p 123.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.