ABSTRACT
Innovative justice forums form a small but important part of the justice landscape in Australia and elsewhere. These include many civil and protective tribunals, local dispute centres, special purpose courts like drug or Indigenous courts, restorative justice conferences and – particularly relevant to this special issue –neighbourhood justice centres. Innovative forums like these are designed to be problem-solving: the focus is on achieving outcomes that resolve the underlying issues. While the substantive results of any legal process are obviously important, one of the most ‘innovative’ features of innovative forums is the way they carry out their tasks. This paper examines the rituals and spaces of three innovative forums, examining in detail one case study from each: a Koori court hearing in a suburban Melbourne court, a family group conference in a suburban house in Dunedin, and a youth court preliminary hearing in the chambers of a juge des enfants in Paris. A comparison of the three hearings allows us to analyse the way spaces are managed and furniture organised, how authority is symbolised, how opening, closing and transitional ceremonies are arranged, and what sort of subjects are produced in the process.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes on contributor
David Tait is Professor of Justice Research in the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at the University of Western Sydney, and Professeur associé at Telecom ParisTech. His interests include court architecture, justice rituals, and technologies used in court and tribunal hearings. He has led five Australian Research Council projects in these areas together with scholars in architecture, psychology, law, forensic science and media studies. Current projects examine a youth Koori court, immersive video conferencing for court hearings and the use of cages or docks to contain defendants on trial. His most recent book is Juries Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror: the case of the Sydney Bomber, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, co-edited with Jane Goodman-Delahunty.
Notes
19 These were observed through context-specific consent processes. The adult Koori court hearing was an open and public hearing observed with participants’ permission; the New Zealand family group conference was observed with the verbal consent of all participants on the day; and the French children’s court hearing was observed within the framework of the Institut des hautes etudes de la justice, of which the author is an associate, and followed the IHEJ’s conventions around research conduct.
32 Much of this interpretation comes from a year-long evaluation of the Youth Koori Court in Parramatta, in which the author was member of the research team (see Williams et al Citation2017).
35 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37.
39 Personal details have been changed to protect the identities of the boys and their families. In both cases, the hearings were private, and permission of all parties was given to permit observations.
Stephen J Parker (1998) Courts and the Public, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration. Brian Opeskin and David Weisbrot (2005) The Promise Of Law Reform, Federation Press. Terry Carney and David Tait (1997) The Adult Guardianship Experiment: Tribunals and Popular Justice, Federation Press. Richard Foster (2013) ‘Towards Leadership: The Emergence of Contemporary Court Administration in Australia’ 5 International Journal for Court Administration 4. doi: 10.18352/ijca.3 Tania Sourdin (2008) Alternative Dispute Resolution, Thomson Lawbook Company. Deborah R Hensler (2003) ‘Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Reshaping Our Legal System’ 108 Penn State Law Review 165. Graham Brawn (2009) ‘The Changing Face of Justice: The Architecture of the Australian Courthouse’ 98 Architecture Australia 39. Fredric I Lederer (1998) ‘The Road to the Virtual Courtroom? A Consideration of Today’s – And Tomorrow’s – High-Technology Courtrooms’ 50 South Carolina Law Review 799. Anne Wallace (2008) ‘Virtual Justice in the Bush: The Use of Court Technology in Remote and Regional Australia’ 19 Journal of Law, Information and Science 1. Arie Freiburg (2001) ‘Problem-Orientated Courts: Innovative Solutions to Intractable Problems?’ 11 Journal of Judicial Administration 8. Pamela M Casey and David B Rottman (2005) ‘Problem-Solving Courts: Models and Trends’ 26 Justice System Journal 35. Kathleen Daly and Hennessey Hayes (2001) Restorative Justice and Conferencing in Australia, Australian Institute of Criminology. Jim Consedine (1995) Restorative Justice: Healing the Effects of Crime, Ploughshares Publications. Bruce J Winick (1997) ‘The Jurisprudence of Therapeutic Jurisprudence’ 3 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 184. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.1.184 Elena Marchetti and Kathleen Daly (2007) ‘Indigenous Sentencing Courts: Towards a Theoretical and Jurisprudential Model’ 29 Sydney Law Review 415. Kathleen Daly (2016) ‘What is Restorative Justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question’ 11 Victims & Offenders 9. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797 Katherine B Carroll (2011) ‘Tribal Law and Reconciliation in the New Iraq’ 65 The Middle East Journal 11. doi: 10.3751/65.1.11 Donna Coker (2006) ‘Restorative Justice, Navajo Peacemaking, and Domestic Violence’ 10 Theoretical Criminology 67. doi: 10.1177/1362480606059983 Kathleen Daly and Elena Marchetti (2012) ‘Innovative Justice Processes: Restorative Justice, Indigenous Justice, and Therapeutic Jurisprudence’ in M Marmo, W de Lint and D Palmer (eds) Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology (4th ed), Lawbook Co. Terry Carney and David Tait (1998) ‘Adult Guardianship: Narrative Readings in the “Shadow” of the Law?’ 21 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 147. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00009-0 Kathleen Daly and Elena Marchetti (2012) ‘Innovative Justice Processes: Restorative Justice, Indigenous Justice, and Therapeutic Jurisprudence’ in M Marmo, W de Lint and D Palmer (eds) Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology (4th ed), Lawbook Co. Neighbourhood Justice Centre (2012) Reflections on Practice: The First Six Years, The Neighbourhood Justice Centre. Stuart Ross (2015). ‘Evaluating Neighbourhood Justice: Measuring and Attributing Outcomes for a Community Justice Program’ 499 Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 1. Anthony Morgan and Rick Brown (2015) ‘Estimating the Costs Associated With Community Justice’ 507 Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 1. Lucy Booth et al (2012) ‘North Liverpool Community Justice Centre: Analysis of Re-Offending Rates and Efficiency of Court Processes’ 10 Ministry of Justice Research Series 12. Noëlle Herrenschmidt et al (2016) Dans les Coulisses de la Loi, Editions de La Martinière – Styles. Katherine F Taylor (1993) In the Theater of Criminal Justice: The Palais de Justice in Second Empire Paris, Princeton University Press. Ido Weijers (2002) ‘The Moral Dialogue: A Pedagogical Perspective on Juvenile Justice’ in I Weijers and RA Duff (eds) Punishing Juveniles: Principle and Critique, Hart Publishing. Thomas J Scheff et al (2015). Goffman Unbound!: A New Paradigm for Social Science, Routledge. Erving Goffman (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Interaction, Doubleday. David Tait (2001) ‘Popular Sovereignty and the Justice Process: Towards a Comparative Methodology for Observing Courtroom Rituals’ 4 Contemporary Justice Review 201. Harold Garfinkel (1956) ‘Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies’ 61 American Journal of Sociology 420. doi: 10.1086/221800 Erving Goffman (1959) ‘The Moral Career of the Mental Patient’ 22 Psychiatry 123. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1959.11023166 Robert Jacob (1994) Images de la Justice: Essai sur l’Iconographie Judiciaire du Moyen Age à l’Âge Classique, Le Léopard d’Or. Pat Carlen (1976) ‘The Staging of Magistrates’ Justice’ 16 The British Journal of Criminology 48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046692 Katherine F Taylor (1993) In the Theater of Criminal Justice: The Palais de Justice in Second Empire Paris, Princeton University Press. Fabien Gelinas et al (2014) ‘Forme et Légitimité de la Justice–Regard sur le Rôle de l’Architecture et des Rituels Judiciaires’ 73 Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 37. doi: 10.3917/riej.073.0037 Antoine Garapon (2001) Bien Juger: Essai sur le Rituel Judiciaire, Odile Jacob. Terry Carney and David Tait (1997) The Adult Guardianship Experiment: Tribunals and Popular Justice, Federation Press. David Tait and Terry R Carney (2013) ‘Transforming Governance and Technology in Civil and Administrative Justice’ 22 Journal of Judicial Administration 119. David Tait (2003) ‘The Ritual Environment of the Mental Health Tribunal Hearing: Inquiries and Reflections’ 10 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 91. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2003.10.1.91 Elena Marchetti and Kathleen Daly (2007) ‘Indigenous Sentencing Courts: Towards a Theoretical and Jurisprudential Model’ 29 Sydney Law Review 415. Paul Havemann (ed) (1999) Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Australia, Canada & New Zealand, Oxford University Press. Jacqueline Fitzgerald (2008) ‘Does Circle Sentencing Reduce Aboriginal Offending?’ 115 BOCSAR NSW Crime and Justice Bulletins. Elena Marchetti and Kathleen Daly (2007) ‘Indigenous Sentencing Courts: Towards a Theoretical and Jurisprudential Model’ 29 Sydney Law Review 415. Heather Aquilina et al (2009) Evaluation of the Aboriginal Sentencing Court of Kalgoorlie, Shelby Consulting. Allan Borowski (2010) ‘Indigenous Participation in Sentencing Young Offenders: Findings from an Evaluation of the Children’s Koori Court of Victoria’ 43 Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 465. doi: 10.1375/acri.43.3.465 Elena Marchetti (2017) ‘Nothing Works? A Meta-Review of Indigenous Sentencing Court Evaluations’ 28 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 257. doi: 10.1080/10345329.2017.12036074 M Williams et al (2017) Youth Koori Court: Review of Parramatta Pilot Program, Western Sydney University. M Williams et al (2017) Youth Koori Court: Review of Parramatta Pilot Program, Western Sydney University. Matiu Dickson (2011) ‘The Rangatahi Court’ 19 Waikato Law Review 86. Thalia Anthony et al (2015) ‘Lessons Lost in Sentencing: Welding Individualised Justice to Indigenous Justice’ 39 Melbourne University Law Review 47. Kathleen Daly and Hennessey Hayes (2001) Restorative Justice and Conferencing in Australia, Australian Institute of Criminology. Meredith Rossner et al (2013) The Process and Dynamics of Restorative Justice: Research on Forum Sentencing, University of Western Sydney. Terry Carney et al (2008) ‘Advocacy and Participation in Mental Health Cases: Realisable Rights or Pipe-Dreams’ 26 Law Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 125. Malcolm M Feeley (1979) The Process is The Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court, Russell Sage Foundation. Meredith Rossner (2013) Just Emotions: Rituals of Restorative Justice, Oxford University Press. Paul Ricœur (1991) ‘Le Juste Entre le Légal et le Bon’ Esprit (1940–) 5. Victor W Turner and Richard Schechner (1988) The Anthropology of Performance, PAJ Publications. Meredith Rossner and David Tait (2011) ‘Contested Emotions: Adversarial Rituals in Non-adversarial Justice Procedures’ 37 Monash University Law Review 241. Erving Goffman (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Interaction, Doubleday. Pierre Bourdieu (1981) ‘Épreuve Scolaire et Consécration Sociale [Les Classes Préparatoires aux Grandes Écoles]’ 39 Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 3. doi: 10.3406/arss.1981.2124 Ido Weijers (2002) ‘The Moral Dialogue: A Pedagogical Perspective on Juvenile Justice’ in I Weijers and RA Duff (eds) Punishing Juveniles: Principle and Critique, Hart Publishing. Ido Weijers (2002) ‘The Moral Dialogue: A Pedagogical Perspective on Juvenile Justice’ in I Weijers and RA Duff (eds) Punishing Juveniles: Principle and Critique, Hart Publishing. Jacques Bourquin (2007) ‘L’image du Jugement Dernier Dans la Salle d’Audience du Tribunal pour Enfants de Paris: Une Tapisserie de Georges Devêche (1946)’ (Hors-série) Revue d’histoire de l’enfance «irrégulière» Le Temps de l’histoire 165. Stefan Brink (2002) ‘Law and Legal Customs in Viking Age Scandinavia’ in J Jesch (ed) The Scandinavians From the Vendel Period to the 10th Century. An Ethnographic Perspective, Boydell. Norman W Spaulding (2012) ‘The Enclosure of Justice: Courthouse Architecture, Due Process, and the Dead Metaphor of Trial’ 24 Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 311. Linda Mulcahy (2007) ‘Architects of Justice: The Politics of Courtroom Design’ 16 Social & Legal Studies 383. doi: 10.1177/0964663907079765