ABSTRACT
In most common-law jurisdictions world-wide, an offender’s remorse is a well-settled mitigating factor in sentencing, with judges obliged to take it into account when formulating an offender’s sentence. However, the importance of remorse in sentencing is matched by its mystery. Given remorse’s central role in the moral drama of the criminal justice process, it is crucial to investigate how remorse is evaluated, and also to understand the limitations of those evaluations. The present article seeks to contribute to that effort by exploring what is involved in judges coming to know — and claiming to know — that ‘this offender is remorseful’. Drawing on in-depth original interviews with 20 magistrates and judges in New South Wales, Australia, we explore how judges themselves understand their own ways of knowing about remorse. We then look at two basic scenes of offender remorse: remorse in the courtroom and remorse outside the courtroom. Many judges want to see remorse in the courtroom, and are often confident that they know it when they see it. But, at the same time, as we shall see, many judges also want evidence of the offender’s remorse outside the courtroom.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributors
Dr. Kate Rossmanith is a Senior Lecturer and Researcher in Cultural Studies at Macquarie University, Australia. She is also a creative nonfiction writer, and is the author of Small Wrongs: How we really say sorry in love, life and law (Hardie Grant Books, 2018), which investigates remorse in the criminal justice system and remorse in our everyday lives. Small Wrongs has been nominated for literary awards in the UK and Australia. Her essays have appeared in The Monthly and Best Australian Essays 2007. In 2018 her short documentary Unnatural Deaths was published by The Guardian as part of a series exploring archives on film. Kate is a co-editor of Remorse and Criminal Justice: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives (Routledge, forthcoming).
Dr. Steven Tudor is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Law, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. His research interests include law and emotions, freedom of conscience and philosophical issues raised by the criminal law. Among Steven’s publications are Compassion and Remorse: Acknowledging the Suffering Other (Leuven, 2001) and, with Michael Proeve, Remorse: Psychological and Jurisprudential Perspectives (Ashgate, 2010). He is a co-editor of Remorse and Criminal Justice: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives (Routledge, forthcoming).
Dr. Michael Proeve is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of Adelaide. He is a clinical and forensic psychologist with experience in forensic mental health and correctional settings. His research interests are in the areas of remorse and shame, mindfulness, and assessment and treatment of sexual offenders. He is the co-author of Remorse: Psychological and Jurisprudential Perspectives (Ashgate, 2010), and a co-editor of Remorse and Criminal Justice: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives (Routledge, forthcoming).
Notes
* This article is a revised version of a paper presented jointly by the authors at Emotions in Legal Practices: Historical and Modern Attitudes Compared, a conference organised by the Australian Research Council Centre for Excellence for the History of Emotions 1100–1800, at the University of Sydney, 26–28 September 2016. The authors would like to thank the conference organisers and participants.
1 R v Phillips [2012] VSCA 140 at [101]–[102] per Harper JA.
6 R v Phillips [2012] VSCA 140 at [101]–[102] per Harper JA.
9 Weisman (Citation2009), p 66. For a discussion of the centrality of performances of remorse to processes of judges’ decision-making, see also Van Oorschot et al. (Citation2017).
12 This research was approved on 19 August 2010 by Rossmanith’s Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 5201000889). This research was made possible because of a Macquarie University internal grant.
14 For example, one of the tensions discussed during Rossmanith’s interviews concerned the question of biology. At the time of the interviews, scientists had recently discovered what has been termed ‘the warrior gene’. This gene supposedly affects levels of the brain chemicals ‘dopamine’ and ‘serotonin’, which in turn affect men’s behaviour and mood (reputedly not so for women). If you are male and have the gene, and if you’ve had an unstable upbringing as a child, you are more prone to violent outbursts. Rossmanith asked a judge if the gene was relevant when sentencing someone. The judge wondered: was he expected to lock up the offender for a shorter period (because a person can’t control his biology and therefore his actions are not entirely his free will), or for a longer time (because he presents more of a danger to society)? In the courts, this question has not yet been resolved (Rossmanith Citation2018, p 124).
15 For a discussion on how ethnographers code fieldnotes, see Madden (Citation2010), pp 139–144.
18 For example, research to date has turned to: how capital juries assess a person’s remorse (Sundby Citation1998); legal debates concerning the relevance of remorse in the sentencing process (Bagaric and Amarasekara Citation2001; Bibas and Bierschbach Citation2004; Tudor Citation2005, Citation2008a, Citation2008b; Ward Citation2006; Murphy Citation2006; Lippke Citation2008); the ways in which assessment of a defendant’s apparent remorse or remorselessness can disadvantage both the defendant and the prosecution (Ward Citation2006); the ways in which a defendant is expected to ‘show’ remorse (Weisman Citation2004); how judges constitute the category of remorse through the criteria they use to decide which claims to remorse are valid (Wood & MacMartin Citation2007; Weisman Citation2009); the role that remorse (in relation to religion) plays in the judiciary’s assessment of moral character, particularly in decisions to grant legal mercy (Murphy Citation2007); the necessity of guiding decision-makers on how to improve their abilities to evaluate remorse (Bandes Citation2011); and an extended examination of legal and psychological perspectives on remorse (Proeve & Tudor Citation2010). Scholars have looked at expectations, including remorse enactments, placed on prisoners (Hall Citation2017; Martel Citation2010). There have also been studies in the area of restorative justice, with attention paid to the role of remorse in restorative justice conferences. See also Tieger (Citation2003), Weisman (Citation2014), Bandes (Citation2016).
23 Susan Bandes (Citation2016) points out the necessity of turning to sources such as interviews with judges and jurors to further understand what exactly, in remorse assessment, is being evaluated, p 313.
24 Such evidence would be classified as evidence of an ‘admission’ under Australia’s uniform evidence laws. See Evidence Act 1995 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and Evidence Act 2008 (Vic).
25 See the High Court of Australia’s discussion of the role and nature of sentencing hearings in GAS v The Queen (2004) 219 CLR 198 and The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270.
26 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [1].
27 See e.g. Neal v The Queen (1982) 149 CLR 305 (Murphy J); Cameron v R (2002) 209 CLR 339 (McHugh J); Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(2)(f); Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 23A(3)(i); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) s 5(2C); Sentencing Act 2017 (SA) s 11(1)(g); Alvares v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 297; Windle v R [2011] NSWCCA 277; Roff v R [2017] NSWCCA 208.
29 All unattributed quotations are from Rossmanith’s original interviews.
30 Philosophical analyses include Thalberg’s (Citation1963) and Tudor’s (Citation2001) discussions of remorse, Taylor’s (Citation1985) comparison of shame and guilt, Dilman’s (Citation1999) comparison of shame, guilt and remorse. Conceptual analyses by psychologists include Baumeister, Stillwell and Heatherton (Citation1994) who review the origin and nature of guilt; Crozier (Citation1998) who discusses the conceptual nature of shame; Lewis (Citation1971) contrasts shame and guilt; while Landman (Citation1993) and Gilovich, Medvec and Kahneman (Citation1998) discuss regret. Empirical studies of these emotions include contrasts of shame and guilt by Wicker, Payne and Morgan (Citation1983), Lindsay-Hartz (Citation1984), Roseman, Wiest and Swartz (Citation1994), Tangney (Citation1991) and exploration of regret by Zeelenberg, Van Dijk, Manstead and van der Pligt (Citation1998).
36 See Sherrard v Jacob [1965] NI 151 and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co v Schultz 43 Ohio 270; 1 NE 324 (1885).
38 For an account of this sentencing hearing, see Rossmanith (Citation2018), pp 3–7.
39 See Barbaro and Zirilli v The Queen [2012] VSCA 288 at [29].
40 Butters v R [2010] NSW CCA 1.
42 For some important research on judges’ views of remorse in other in other jurisdictions, see Zhong et al (Citation2014) and Van Oorschot et al (Citation2017). Zhong and colleagues conducted interviews with the judges in the U.S. state of Connecticut, while more recently Van Oorschot and colleagues conducted interviews with, and observation of, judges in the Netherlands. See also Johansen (forthcoming) with its focus on judges in Danish courtrooms.
43 See Weisman (Citation2014), pp 12–18 on remorse and moral communities.
Michael Proeve and Steven Tudor (2010) Remorse: Psychology and Jurisprudential Perspectives, Farnham, Ashgate M Costanzo and S Costanzo (1992) ‘Jury Decision Making in the Capital Penalty Phase: Legal Assumptions, Empirical Finding, and a Research Agenda’ 16 Law and Human Behavior 185. doi: 10.1007/BF01044797 Kate Rossmanith (2015) ‘Affect and the Judicial Assessment of Offenders: Feeling and Judging Remorse’ 21(2) Body & Society 167. doi: 10.1177/1357034X14558073 Kate Rossmanith (2015) ‘Affect and the Judicial Assessment of Offenders: Feeling and Judging Remorse’ 21(2) Body & Society 167. doi: 10.1177/1357034X14558073 M Bagaric and K Amarasekara (2001) ‘Feeling Sorry? – Tell Someone Who Cares: The Irrelevance of Remorse in Sentencing’ 40(4) The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 364. doi: 10.1111/1468-2311.00215 Bryan S Ward (2006) ‘Sentencing Without Remorse’ 38 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 131 RA Duff (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford University Press R Lippke (2008) ‘Response to Tudor: Remorse-based Sentence Reductions in Theory and Practice’ 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 259. doi: 10.1007/s11572-008-9051-8 Jeffrie Murphy (2006) ‘Well Excuse Me! – Remorse, Apology, and Criminal Sentencing’ 38 Arizona State Law Journal 371. Jeffrie Murphy (2007) ‘Remorse, Apology, and Mercy’ 4 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 423. Bryan S Ward (2006) ‘Sentencing Without Remorse’ 38 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 131 Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. Kate Rossmanith (2018) Small Wrongs: How We Really Say Sorry in Love, Life and Law, Hardie Grant Books. Richard Weisman (2009) ‘Being and Doing: The Judicial Use of Remorse to Construct Character and Community’ 18 Social and Legal Studies 47. doi: 10.1177/0964663908100333 Richard Weisman (2009) ‘Being and Doing: The Judicial Use of Remorse to Construct Character and Community’ 18 Social and Legal Studies 47. doi: 10.1177/0964663908100333 Irene van Oorschot, Peter Mascini, and Don Weenink (2017) ‘Remorse in Context(s): A Qualitative Exploration of the Negotiation of Remorse and Its Consequences’ 26(3) Social & Legal Studies 359. Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. Michael Jackson (ed) (1996) Things as They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology, Georgetown University Press. Kate Rossmanith (2018) Small Wrongs: How We Really Say Sorry in Love, Life and Law, Hardie Grant Books. Raymond Madden (2010) Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography, Sage. Kathryn Leader (2008) Trials, Truth-telling and the Performing Body, Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Sydney. Kate Rossmanith (2018) Small Wrongs: How We Really Say Sorry in Love, Life and Law, Hardie Grant Books. SE Sundby (1998) ‘The Capital Jury and Absolution: The Intersection of Trial Strategy, Remorse and the Death Penalty’ 83 Cornell Law Review 1557. M Bagaric and K Amarasekara (2001) ‘Feeling Sorry? – Tell Someone Who Cares: The Irrelevance of Remorse in Sentencing’ 40(4) The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 364. doi: 10.1111/1468-2311.00215 S Bibas and R Bieschbach (2004) ‘Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure’ 114 The Yale Law Journal 85. doi: 10.2307/4135717 Steven Tudor (2005) ‘The Relevance of Remorse in Sentencing: A Reply to Bagaric and Amaraskara (and Duff)’ 10 Deakin Law Review 760. doi: 10.21153/dlr2005vol10no2art303 Steven Tudor (2008a) ‘Why Should Remorse be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?’ 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 241. doi: 10.1007/s11572-007-9044-z Steven Tudor (2008b) ‘Remorse, Reform and the Real World: Reply to Lippke’ 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 269. doi: 10.1007/s11572-008-9053-6 Bryan S Ward (2006) ‘Sentencing Without Remorse’ 38 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 131 Jeffrie Murphy (2006) ‘Well Excuse Me! – Remorse, Apology, and Criminal Sentencing’ 38 Arizona State Law Journal 371. R Lippke (2008) ‘Response to Tudor: Remorse-based Sentence Reductions in Theory and Practice’ 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 259. doi: 10.1007/s11572-008-9051-8 Bryan S Ward (2006) ‘Sentencing Without Remorse’ 38 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 131 Richard Weisman (2004) ‘Showing Remorse: Reflections on the Gap between Expression and Attribution in Cases of Wrongful Conviction’ 46(2) Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 121. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.46.2.121 LA Wood and C MacMartin (2007) ‘Constructing Remorse: Judges’ Sentencing Decisions in Child Sexual Assault Cases’ 26 Journal of Language and Social Psychology 343. doi: 10.1177/0261927X07306979 Richard Weisman (2009) ‘Being and Doing: The Judicial Use of Remorse to Construct Character and Community’ 18 Social and Legal Studies 47. doi: 10.1177/0964663908100333 Jeffrie Murphy (2007) ‘Remorse, Apology, and Mercy’ 4 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 423. Susan A Bandes (2011) ‘Evaluation of Remorse is Here to Stay: We Should Focus on Improving its Dynamics’ in PH Robinson and S Garvey (eds) Criminal Law Conversations, Oxford University Press. Michael Proeve and Steven Tudor (2010) Remorse: Psychology and Jurisprudential Perspectives, Farnham, Ashgate Maggie Hall (2017) The Lived Sentence: Rethinking Sentencing, Risk and Rehabilitation, Palgrave. J Martel (2010) ‘Remorse and the Production of Truth’ 12(4) Punishment and Society 414. doi: 10.1177/1462474510376139 Alan Tieger (2003) ‘Remorse and Mitigation in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ 16 Leiden Journal of International Law 777. doi: 10.1017/S0922156503001432 Richard Weisman (2014) Showing Remorse: Law and the Social Control of Emotion, Ashgate. Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. R Zhong, Madelon Baranoski, Neal Feigenson, Larry Davidson, Alec Buchanan, and Howard V Zonana (2014) ‘So You’re Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Criminal Law’, 42(1) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2014, 39. Kate Rossmanith (2014) ‘Getting Into the Box: Risky Enactments of Remorse in the Courtroom’ 12 About Performance 7. Kate Rossmanith (2015) ‘Affect and the Judicial Assessment of Offenders: Feeling and Judging Remorse’ 21(2) Body & Society 167. doi: 10.1177/1357034X14558073 Maggie Hall and Kate Rossmanith (2016) ‘Imposed Stories: Prisoner Self-narratives in the Criminal Justice System in New South Wales, Australia’ 5(1) International Journal for Crime, Justice & Social Democracy 38. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.284 Irene van Oorschot, Peter Mascini, and Don Weenink (2017) ‘Remorse in Context(s): A Qualitative Exploration of the Negotiation of Remorse and Its Consequences’ 26(3) Social & Legal Studies 359. Richard Weisman (2014) Showing Remorse: Law and the Social Control of Emotion, Ashgate. Irene van Oorschot, Peter Mascini, and Don Weenink (2017) ‘Remorse in Context(s): A Qualitative Exploration of the Negotiation of Remorse and Its Consequences’ 26(3) Social & Legal Studies 359. LA Wood and C MacMartin (2007) ‘Constructing Remorse: Judges’ Sentencing Decisions in Child Sexual Assault Cases’ 26 Journal of Language and Social Psychology 343. doi: 10.1177/0261927X07306979 Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. Michael Proeve, David Smith, and Diane Mead Niblo (1999) ‘Mitigation Without Definition: Remorse in the Criminal Justice System’ 32 Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 16. doi: 10.1177/000486589903200103 R Zhong, Madelon Baranoski, Neal Feigenson, Larry Davidson, Alec Buchanan, and Howard V Zonana (2014) ‘So You’re Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Criminal Law’, 42(1) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2014, 39. I Thalberg (1963), ‘VI.—REMORSE’ LXXII Mind 545. doi: 10.1093/mind/LXXII.288.545 Steven Tudor (2001) Compassion and Remorse: Acknowledging the Suffering Other, Leuven, Peeters. G Taylor (1985) Pride, Shame and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment, Clarendon Press. I Dilman (1999) ‘Shame, Guilt, and Remorse’ 22(4) Philosophical Investigations 312. doi: 10.1111/1467-9205.00102 RF Baumeister, AM Stillwell, and TF Heatherton (1994) ‘Guilt: An Interpersonal Approach’ 115 Psychological Bulletin 243. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.243 R Crozier (1998) ‘Self-consciousness in Shame: The Role of the ‘Other’’ 28(3) Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 273. doi: 10.1111/1468-5914.00075 HB Lewis (1971) Shame and Guilt in Neurosis, International Universities Press. J Landman (1993) Regret: The Persistence of the Possible, Oxford University Press. T Gilovich, VH Medvec, and D Kahneman (1998) ‘Varieties of Regret: A Debate and Partial Resolution’ 105 Psychological Review 602. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.602 FW Wicker, GC Payne and RD Morgan (1983) ‘Participant Descriptions of Guilt and Shame’ 7(1) Motivation and Emotion 25. doi: 10.1007/BF00992963 J Lindsay-Hartz (1984) ‘Contrasting Experiences of Shame and Guilt’ 27 American Behavioral Scientist 689. doi: 10.1177/000276484027006003 IJ Roseman, C Wiest, and TS Swartz (1994) ‘Phenomenology, Behaviors, and Goals Differentiate Discrete Emotions’ 67(2) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 206. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206 JP Tangney (1991) ‘Moral Affect: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’ 61 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 598. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.598 M Zeelenberg, WW van Dijk, ASR Manstead, and J van der Pligt (1998) ‘The Experience of Regret and Disappointment’ 12(2) Cognition and Emotion 221. doi: 10.1080/026999398379727 Michael Proeve and Steven Tudor (2010) Remorse: Psychology and Jurisprudential Perspectives, Farnham, Ashgate Kate Rossmanith (2014) ‘Getting Into the Box: Risky Enactments of Remorse in the Courtroom’ 12 About Performance 7. Irene van Oorschot, Peter Mascini, and Don Weenink (2017) ‘Remorse in Context(s): A Qualitative Exploration of the Negotiation of Remorse and Its Consequences’ 26(3) Social & Legal Studies 359. Kate Rossmanith (2015) ‘Affect and the Judicial Assessment of Offenders: Feeling and Judging Remorse’ 21(2) Body & Society 167. doi: 10.1177/1357034X14558073 Kate Rossmanith (2015) ‘Affect and the Judicial Assessment of Offenders: Feeling and Judging Remorse’ 21(2) Body & Society 167. doi: 10.1177/1357034X14558073 Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. Laurie L Levenson (2008) ‘Courtroom Demeanor: The Theatre of the Courtroom’ 92 Minnesota Law Review 573. Jeremy A Blumenthal (1993) ‘A Wipe of the Hands, A Lick of the Lips: The Validity of Demeanor Evidence in Assessing Witness Credibility’ 72 Nebraska Law Review 1157 Olin Guy Wellborn III (1991) ‘Demeanor’ 76 Cornell Law Review 1075. Kate Rossmanith (2018) Small Wrongs: How We Really Say Sorry in Love, Life and Law, Hardie Grant Books. Susan A Bandes (2016) ‘Remorse and Demeanour in the Courtroom: Cognitive Science and the Evaluation of Contrition’ in J Hunter, P Roberts, S Young, and D Dixon (eds) The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice, Hart Publishing, 309–26. R Zhong, Madelon Baranoski, Neal Feigenson, Larry Davidson, Alec Buchanan, and Howard V Zonana (2014) ‘So You’re Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Criminal Law’, 42(1) Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2014, 39. Irene van Oorschot, Peter Mascini, and Don Weenink (2017) ‘Remorse in Context(s): A Qualitative Exploration of the Negotiation of Remorse and Its Consequences’ 26(3) Social & Legal Studies 359. Richard Weisman (2014) Showing Remorse: Law and the Social Control of Emotion, Ashgate. Additional information
Funding
This work was supported by Macquarie University [Grant Number 9201001805].