How to Organize Creative and Innovative Teams: Creative Self-Efficacy and Innovative Team Performance

Figures & data

Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix

	M	SD	Min.	Max.	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. Performance	7.03	1.11	4	10	-
2. CSE	5.43	0.36	4.48	6.54	0.17	-
3. Major diversity	0.58	0.15	0.00	0.78	0.17	0.08	-
4. Agreeableness	2.44	0.83	0.46	4.22	0.16	0.62*	−0.12	-
5. Age diversity	0.08	0.05	0.00	0.24	−0.08	0.09	0.02	−0.07	-
6. Team size	4.19	0.61	3.00	6.00	−0.15	0.15	0.14	0.15	0.15	-
7. Project period	7.93	3.54	3	12	0.23*	−0.05	0.32*	0.03	−0.21*	−0.03	-
8. Gender diversity	0.27	0.21	0.00	0.50	0.01	0.07	−0.08	0.28*	−0.10	0.05	0.10	-
9. Creative thinking capability	59.31	14.09	29.50	88.38	0.34*	0.06	0.15	0.13	−0.23*	−0.28*	0.53*	0.08	-

Table 2. Results of hierarchical regression predicting team innovative performance

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5
CSE – (A)		0.556	0.715*	0.626*	1.072*
		(0.071)	(0.023)	(0.042)	(0.035)
(CSE)^2 – (B)			−1.214*	−2.309***	−0.0328
			(0.038)	(0.001)	(0.970)
Major				−0.128
Diversity-(C)				(0.878)
(A)*(C)				1.349
				(0.625)
(B)*(C)				18.92**
				(0.005)
Agreeableness					0.157
-(D)					(0.375)
(A)*(D)					−0.943
					(0.105)
(B)*(D)					−1.263
					(0.108)
Age	0.261	−0.102	0.780	1.105	1.310
Heterogeneity	(0.915)	(0.967)	(0.748)	(0.637)	(0.593)
Team Size	−0.135	−0.196	−0.304	−0.339	−0.456*
	(0.467)	(0.295)	(0.110)	(0.069)	(0.026)
Project Length	0.0262	0.0336	0.0340	0.0322	0.0373
	(0.470)	(0.351)	(0.336)	(0.370)	(0.288)
Gender	−0.0718	−0.136	−0.263	−0.231	−0.0701
Heterogeneity	(0.891)	(0.793)	(0.613)	(0.646)	(0.898)
CTC	0.0221*	0.0193*	0.0203*	0.0215*	0.0194*
	(0.021)	(0.043)	(0.031)	(0.018)	(0.043)
CSE cov.			2.894	3.465	2.369
			(0.159)	(0.082)	(0.247)
N	101	101	101	101	101
adj. R^2	0.07958	0.10173	0.13411	0.20328	0.15103
F	2.729*	2.887*	2.936**	3.319***	2.617**

p-values in parentheses

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001