646
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Flow routing with bottom withdrawal to improve water quality in Walnut Canyon Reservoir, California

, &

Figures & data

Table 1 Basin characteristics of Walnut Canyon Reservoir.

Figure 1 Study site: Walnut Canyon Reservoir, near Anaheim, CA.
Figure 1 Study site: Walnut Canyon Reservoir, near Anaheim, CA.

Table 2 Physical conditions present on calibration sampling dates.

Figure 2 Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) (a) lake surface elevation and (b) temperature profiles over time.
Figure 2 Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) (a) lake surface elevation and (b) temperature profiles over time.
Figure 3 Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) (a) dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles and (b) total phosphorus concentrations over time. Deviation between predicted and observed metalimnetic DO attributed to chlorinated inflows and induced oxygen demand.
Figure 3 Observed (symbols) and predicted (line) (a) dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles and (b) total phosphorus concentrations over time. Deviation between predicted and observed metalimnetic DO attributed to chlorinated inflows and induced oxygen demand.
Figure 4 Predicted temperature profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal.
Figure 4 Predicted temperature profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal.
Figure 5 Predicted DO profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal.
Figure 5 Predicted DO profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal.
Figure 6 Predicted total P profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal. Note difference in scale for existing 2010 conditions (0–1.6 mg/L) vs. other scenarios (0–0.16 mg/L).
Figure 6 Predicted total P profiles in water column over time: (a) existing (reference), (b) aeration, (c) hypolimnetic oxygenation, and (d) flow routing+bottom withdrawal. Note difference in scale for existing 2010 conditions (0–1.6 mg/L) vs. other scenarios (0–0.16 mg/L).
Figure 7 Observed (a) temperature and (b) DO profiles over time in Walnut Canyon Reservoir, with flow routing with bottom withdrawal implemented in 2011.
Figure 7 Observed (a) temperature and (b) DO profiles over time in Walnut Canyon Reservoir, with flow routing with bottom withdrawal implemented in 2011.
Figure 8 Observed concentrations of (a) sulfide, (b) total Mn, and (c) total P.
Figure 8 Observed concentrations of (a) sulfide, (b) total Mn, and (c) total P.
Figure 9 Thermal stability of the water column of Water Canyon Reservoir from measured temperature profiles with offline storage and operation of a SolarBee in 2010 and flow routing/bottom withdrawal in 2011.
Figure 9 Thermal stability of the water column of Water Canyon Reservoir from measured temperature profiles with offline storage and operation of a SolarBee in 2010 and flow routing/bottom withdrawal in 2011.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.