2,374
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Nine years of phosphorus management with lanthanum modified bentonite (Phoslock) in a eutrophic, shallow swimming lake in Germany

, &

Figures & data

Table 1. Main morphometric and physicochemical (before application of LMB) characteristics of Lake Baerensee.

Table 2. Annual mean values of samples from 1 and 3 m depth. Variables in italics were considered for principal component analysis (PCA). Number of samples (n), annual mean values (mean), minimum (min), and maximum (max) values are shown. The n of total inorganic nitrogen (TIN), ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total nitrogen (TN), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), calcium (Ca), and dissolved silica (SiO2) is identical to the n shown for total phosphorus (TP). Values were set as limit of detection when they fell below. Capital letters (A, B, C, and D) indicate time periods used in tests for significant differences and classification in PCA. LMB reapplications are represented with a slash and were conducted in May 2010 and in March 2013.

Figure 1. Range of (a) total phosphorus concentrations, (b) chlorophyll a concentrations, and (c) total inorganic nitrogen concentrations among temporal subgroups (A–D). Samples in period A (n = 9) were taken in 2007, the year of the initial LMB application. B (n = 14) comprises samples from 2008 to the first reapplication in June 2010. C (n = 16) covers the period between the first and the second reapplication of LMB in March 2013. Samples in period D (n = 14) were taken after the second reapplication of LMB up to end of 2015. Lines within the boxes mark the median. Lines below and above the median indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; whiskers below and above the boxes indicate the 10th and the 90th percentiles, respectively; and dots mark minimum and maximum concentrations of the range. Groups that do not share the same small letter (a, b, c; above the boxes) are significantly different (Mann–Whitney U-test; P < 0.05).

Figure 1. Range of (a) total phosphorus concentrations, (b) chlorophyll a concentrations, and (c) total inorganic nitrogen concentrations among temporal subgroups (A–D). Samples in period A (n = 9) were taken in 2007, the year of the initial LMB application. B (n = 14) comprises samples from 2008 to the first reapplication in June 2010. C (n = 16) covers the period between the first and the second reapplication of LMB in March 2013. Samples in period D (n = 14) were taken after the second reapplication of LMB up to end of 2015. Lines within the boxes mark the median. Lines below and above the median indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; whiskers below and above the boxes indicate the 10th and the 90th percentiles, respectively; and dots mark minimum and maximum concentrations of the range. Groups that do not share the same small letter (a, b, c; above the boxes) are significantly different (Mann–Whitney U-test; P < 0.05).

Figure 2. Results of principal component (PC) analysis for selected lake water characteristics depicted as a biplot along first (PC 1) and second (PC 2) principal component. Samples are classified with time periods (A–D); hatched areas cluster samples from period A and B visually. NH4-N = ammonium nitrogen concentration; Chl-a = chlorophyll a concentration; DOC = dissolved organic carbon concentration; SiO2 = dissolved silica concentration; TP = total phosphorus concentration; Ca = calcium concentration; EV = eigenvalue; CV = cumulative variance explained. Variables were ln transformed before analysis.

Figure 2. Results of principal component (PC) analysis for selected lake water characteristics depicted as a biplot along first (PC 1) and second (PC 2) principal component. Samples are classified with time periods (A–D); hatched areas cluster samples from period A and B visually. NH4-N = ammonium nitrogen concentration; Chl-a = chlorophyll a concentration; DOC = dissolved organic carbon concentration; SiO2 = dissolved silica concentration; TP = total phosphorus concentration; Ca = calcium concentration; EV = eigenvalue; CV = cumulative variance explained. Variables were ln transformed before analysis.

Table 3. Classification of ln transformed variables with the axes by Pearson's correlation coefficients of principal components (PC) scores and variable scores. Asterisks denote significant correlations (α < 0.01).

Figure 3. Development of mean annual chlorophyll a (Chl-a) concentrations and mean annual total P concentrations depicted in a scatter plot. Pre (n = 3) is only considered as a separated group in this plot and relates to available data from 2007 before application. Trophic states were set with reference to Vollenweider and Kerekes (Citation1982).

Figure 3. Development of mean annual chlorophyll a (Chl-a) concentrations and mean annual total P concentrations depicted in a scatter plot. Pre (n = 3) is only considered as a separated group in this plot and relates to available data from 2007 before application. Trophic states were set with reference to Vollenweider and Kerekes (Citation1982).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.