Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Distribution, Possible Sources and Toxicity Equivalency in Urban Drains

Abstract

Wastewater from urban areas constitutes one of the major sources of pollutants contributed to aquatic ecosystem. This study was carried out to elucidate the occurrence and possible source of US Environmental Protection Agency identified 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and sediments from the urban wastewater drains in Delhi, India. A total 60 samples (water and sediment) collected during year 2011–2012, and analyzed the following USEPA methods. Water and sediment samples were extracted using liquid-liquid and ultrasonication techniques, respectively. Glass column chromatography with activated silica was used for sample extracts clean-up, followed by quantification on HPLC equipped with diode array detector at 254 nm wavelength using mixture of acetonitrule and water as mobile phase. Concentrations of total 16 PAHs (∑16PAHs) in all drain water samples ranged from 0.29–35.22 μg/L (mean ± SD, 10.83 ± 10.66 μg/L), predominated by two- and three -ring PAHs. The ∑16PAHs concentrations in all collected sediments ranged between 220–19321 μg/kg (mean±SD, 5574 ± 6820 μg/kg) dry weights. High molecular weight PAHs (≥4-ring PAHs) were dominant in sediment samples. Benzo(a)pyrene equivalent (BaPeq), a relative carcinogenic potential to the corresponding PAHs to BaP was estimated and presented. A selected number of concentration ratios of specific PAHs compounds were calculated and used to diagnose the possible sources of PAHs contamination. The diagnostic ratios reflected pyrogenic input from gasoline or diesel powered vehicular emissions as the major source of PAHs. The levels of PAHs observed in water and sediments were compared with similar studies undertaken in other regions of the world.

Key Words:

• BaP toxicity equivalency
• diagnostic ratios
• priority PAHs
• sediment
• urban wastewater

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are thankful to authorities of Central Pollution Control Board for support and guidance to conduct this work. The authors are also thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments. The views expressed in this article are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the organization.