Publication Cover
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications
An International Journal of Computation and Methodology
Volume 70, 2016 - Issue 8
110
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Heat transfer augmentation of a quasi-two-dimensional MHD duct flow via electrically driven vortices

, &
Pages 847-869 | Received 28 Apr 2016, Accepted 23 Jun 2016, Published online: 20 Sep 2016
 

ABSTRACT

The fluid dynamics and heat transfer characteristics of magnetohydrodynamic duct flow often degrade the laminarization caused by the magnetic field. The present work evaluates the performance of a system featuring alternating current injection from a point electrode as a vortex promoter for enhancement of the thermal-hydraulic characteristics. It is found that the vortices generated by the current injection alone generally induce a greater thermal-hydraulic performance with a significantly smaller additional pressure loss than configurations featuring a physical obstacle. A maximum overall efficiency index of 1.83 was recorded within the parameter space investigated.

Nomenclature

a=

duct height (out-of-plane)

B=

uniform out-of-plane magnetic field strength

Cp=

constant pressure specific heat capacity

CD=

cylinder drag coefficient

Ec=

Eckert number

f=

vortex shedding frequency

ff=

current injection frequency

f0=

natural vortex shedding frequency

h=

vortex street lateral spacing

H=

friction parameter

Ha=

Hartmann number

HR*=

overall heat transfer enhancement ratio

I=

current injection amplitude

l=

vortex street longitudinal spacing

ly=

transverse electrode position

L=

half duct width

Ld=

length of downstream flow region

Lw=

length of heated wall

2=

integral of velocity magnitude throughout the domain

n=

number of Hartmann layers

N=

interaction parameter

Nu=

time averaged Nusselt number

=

Nu for the same duct in the absence of a current injection and a cylinder

=

local instantaneous Nusselt number

p=

pressure

Δp=

time-averaged pressure drop

=

time-averaged pressure drop for a base case with no cylinder

=

overall net power enhancement

Pheat=

heat power

Pflow=

pumping power

PR*=

overall pressure penalty ratio

Pe=

Peclet number

Pr=

Prandtl number

ReL=

Reynolds number based on half duct width

St=

Srouhal number

t=

time

u=

x-direction velocity component

u=

velocity projected onto (x,y) plane

u0=

force vector field

U0=

peak fluid velocity at duct inlet

Uξ=

wake advection velocity

x=

streamwise coordinate

y=

transverse coordinate

z=

spanwise coordinate

α=

duct aspect ratio

β=

blockage ratio

δS=

Shercliff boundary layer thickness

η*=

overall efficiency index

κT=

thermal diffusivity

ν=

fluid kinematic viscosity

ρ=

density

σ=

electrical conductivity

θ=

temperature

τ=

current injection pulse width

ξp=

peak vorticity

ωf=

current forcing frequency

Nomenclature

a=

duct height (out-of-plane)

B=

uniform out-of-plane magnetic field strength

Cp=

constant pressure specific heat capacity

CD=

cylinder drag coefficient

Ec=

Eckert number

f=

vortex shedding frequency

ff=

current injection frequency

f0=

natural vortex shedding frequency

h=

vortex street lateral spacing

H=

friction parameter

Ha=

Hartmann number

HR*=

overall heat transfer enhancement ratio

I=

current injection amplitude

l=

vortex street longitudinal spacing

ly=

transverse electrode position

L=

half duct width

Ld=

length of downstream flow region

Lw=

length of heated wall

2=

integral of velocity magnitude throughout the domain

n=

number of Hartmann layers

N=

interaction parameter

Nu=

time averaged Nusselt number

=

Nu for the same duct in the absence of a current injection and a cylinder

=

local instantaneous Nusselt number

p=

pressure

Δp=

time-averaged pressure drop

=

time-averaged pressure drop for a base case with no cylinder

=

overall net power enhancement

Pheat=

heat power

Pflow=

pumping power

PR*=

overall pressure penalty ratio

Pe=

Peclet number

Pr=

Prandtl number

ReL=

Reynolds number based on half duct width

St=

Srouhal number

t=

time

u=

x-direction velocity component

u=

velocity projected onto (x,y) plane

u0=

force vector field

U0=

peak fluid velocity at duct inlet

Uξ=

wake advection velocity

x=

streamwise coordinate

y=

transverse coordinate

z=

spanwise coordinate

α=

duct aspect ratio

β=

blockage ratio

δS=

Shercliff boundary layer thickness

η*=

overall efficiency index

κT=

thermal diffusivity

ν=

fluid kinematic viscosity

ρ=

density

σ=

electrical conductivity

θ=

temperature

τ=

current injection pulse width

ξp=

peak vorticity

ωf=

current forcing frequency

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 716.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.