Figures & data
Figure 3. Detailed schematics of the computational model. (a) Wedge duct configuration; (b) Dimpled endwall configuration; (c) Pin fin and dimple configuration; (d) Dimple configuration.
![Figure 3. Detailed schematics of the computational model. (a) Wedge duct configuration; (b) Dimpled endwall configuration; (c) Pin fin and dimple configuration; (d) Dimple configuration.](/cms/asset/0fdea726-06de-4558-9559-0e4567aa4a1f/unht_a_1543920_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1. Studied cases.
Table 2. Grid independence check.
Figure 7. Comparison of the area-averaged Nusselt number on the dimpled endwall for ranging from -0.4 to 0.4.
![Figure 7. Comparison of the area-averaged Nusselt number on the dimpled endwall for Ro ranging from -0.4 to 0.4.](/cms/asset/1dc9236c-f8d2-4629-a714-bd19bd5ff165/unht_a_1543920_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at = 0.3.
![Figure 8. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.](/cms/asset/6327ab3a-1e29-40d3-affc-8ac3c361480a/unht_a_1543920_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. Comparison of the vorticity isosurface and streamline distributions in the vicinity of the pin fin for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case B1 at = 0.3.
![Figure 9. Comparison of the vorticity isosurface and streamline distributions in the vicinity of the pin fin for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case B1 at Ro = 0.3.](/cms/asset/de0c96d2-802d-4c2b-aa70-b31257d2b9cf/unht_a_1543920_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 11. Comparison of the limiting streamline distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at = 0.3.
![Figure 11. Comparison of the limiting streamline distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.](/cms/asset/9848a7f4-776d-4f88-85b4-a165590e2745/unht_a_1543920_f0011_c.jpg)
Figure 12. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions along the centerline on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at = 0.3.
![Figure 12. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions along the centerline on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.3.](/cms/asset/ad09a5a3-d2ff-4b96-b8ba-f41c1dd87e22/unht_a_1543920_f0012_c.jpg)
Figure 13. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at = 0.2.
![Figure 13. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.](/cms/asset/b08d60de-df01-4c23-82d6-bd00aac0f3d6/unht_a_1543920_f0013_c.jpg)
Figure 15. Comparison of the TKE distributions at the central streamwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at = 0.2.
![Figure 15. Comparison of the TKE distributions at the central streamwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.](/cms/asset/844e0cb2-7fca-4a99-a95d-c3c1abd164f3/unht_a_1543920_f0015_c.jpg)