Publication Cover
Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications
An International Journal of Computation and Methodology
Volume 74, 2018 - Issue 10
1,490
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Convergence angle and dimple shape effects on the heat transfer characteristics in a rotating dimple-pin fin wedge duct

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1611-1635 | Received 08 Aug 2018, Accepted 30 Oct 2018, Published online: 04 Feb 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Typical cooling structure of gas turbine blade.

Figure 1. Typical cooling structure of gas turbine blade.

Figure 2. General schematics of the computational model.

Figure 2. General schematics of the computational model.

Figure 3. Detailed schematics of the computational model. (a) Wedge duct configuration; (b) Dimpled endwall configuration; (c) Pin fin and dimple configuration; (d) Dimple configuration.

Figure 3. Detailed schematics of the computational model. (a) Wedge duct configuration; (b) Dimpled endwall configuration; (c) Pin fin and dimple configuration; (d) Dimple configuration.

Figure 4. Concept of rotation.

Figure 4. Concept of rotation.

Figure 5. Comparison of the CFD results and the experimental results.

Figure 5. Comparison of the CFD results and the experimental results.

Table 1. Studied cases.

Figure 6. The mesh details.

Figure 6. The mesh details.

Table 2. Grid independence check.

Figure 7. Comparison of the area-averaged Nusselt number on the dimpled endwall for Ro ranging from -0.4 to 0.4.

Figure 7. Comparison of the area-averaged Nusselt number on the dimpled endwall for Ro ranging from -0.4 to 0.4.

Figure 8. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 8. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 9. Comparison of the vorticity isosurface and streamline distributions in the vicinity of the pin fin for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case B1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 9. Comparison of the vorticity isosurface and streamline distributions in the vicinity of the pin fin for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case B1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 11. Comparison of the limiting streamline distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 11. Comparison of the limiting streamline distributions at the dimpled endwall surface for the Baseline, Case B1 and Case C1 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 12. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions along the centerline on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 12. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions along the centerline on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.3.

Figure 13. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 13. Comparison of the Nusselt number distributions on the dimpled endwall surface for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 15. Comparison of the TKE distributions at the central streamwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 15. Comparison of the TKE distributions at the central streamwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 16. Comparison of the swirling strength at the spanwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 16. Comparison of the swirling strength at the spanwise plane for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 17. Comparison of the total pressure loss at the central longitudinal plane compared to the inlet total pressure for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.

Figure 17. Comparison of the total pressure loss at the central longitudinal plane compared to the inlet total pressure for Cases C1, C2, and C3 at Ro = 0.2.