5,619
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Weight of evidence evaluation for chemical-induced immunotoxicity for PFOA and PFOS: findings from an independent panel of experts

, , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 34-51 | Received 01 Dec 2022, Accepted 15 Mar 2023, Published online: 28 Apr 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Key epidemiological studies for human immune response to PFAS exposures (as PFAS in serum).

Table 2. Key animal toxicity studies to evaluate immune response to PFOA and/or PFOS since 2016.

Table 3. Expert panel participants.

Table 4. Key areas of improvement with current animal models for immunotoxicity.

Table 5. Key covariates to consider for establishing fluctuations in vaccine antibody titer (VAT).

Table 6. Recommended biomarkers and metrics for establishing potential immunotoxicity in human studies and animal bioassays.

Figure 1. Panelist responses to how the Budtz-Jørgensen and Grandjean (Citation2018) study should be used in a risk assessment for PFAS/PFOA.

Figure 1. Panelist responses to how the Budtz-Jørgensen and Grandjean (Citation2018) study should be used in a risk assessment for PFAS/PFOA.

Figure 2. Mean confidence ratings by subpanel for each of the modified Bradford Hill criteria for causality.

Figure 2. Mean confidence ratings by subpanel for each of the modified Bradford Hill criteria for causality.

Figure 3. Ratings for how well evidence for PFOA and PFOS support extrapolation to other PFAAs. 1 = extrapolation is not supported; 5 = extrapolation strongly supported.

Figure 3. Ratings for how well evidence for PFOA and PFOS support extrapolation to other PFAAs. 1 = extrapolation is not supported; 5 = extrapolation strongly supported.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (929.6 KB)