1,260
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Time Matters: Framing Antismoking Messages Using Current Smokers’ Preexisting Perceptions of Temporal Distance to Smoking-Related Health Risks

&
Pages 338-348 | Published online: 17 Jan 2017
 

ABSTRACT

This study examined the effects of temporal framing used in messages about the future likelihood of developing smoking-related diseases on intention to quit smoking. Based on construal level theory (CLT), a causal model delineating the relationships among four variables—perceived temporal distance, personal relevance, perceived susceptibility, and behavioral intention—was proposed. The model was validated by an online experiment with a sample of 222 current smokers, revealing the effects of perceived temporal distance on behavioral intention via personal relevance and perceived susceptibility. Following the CLT-grounded model, the effects of different temporal frames (near future vs. distant future) on the four variables were tested. The near-future frame featured a risk perceived to be more temporally proximal (i.e., heart attack), and the distant-future frame featured a risk perceived to be more temporally distant (i.e., larynx cancer) among current smokers. Participants exposed to the near-future frame reported significantly shorter perceived temporal distance, greater personal relevance and perceived susceptibility to the risk portrayed in the message, and greater intention to quit smoking than participants exposed to the distant-future frame. Implications for antismoking communications are discussed.

Notes

1 The stimuli are available from the corresponding author upon request.

2 A weak but significant correlation was found between perceived temporal distance and perceived relevance (r = −.22, p < .001). However, a confirmatory factor analysis revealed a significant chi-square difference between the unconstrained and constrained models of perceived temporal distance and perceived relevance (t = 2.19, p < .05), suggesting that the two constructs might present divergent validity (Zait & Bertea, Citation2011).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 371.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.