https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-3380
Figures & data
Figure 1. Map of Burniston Bay showing the approximate location (asterisk) the specimen was found, and geological context (stratigraphy adapted from Rawson & Wright, Citation2018).
Figure 2. EBT (Enigmatic Burniston Trackway): A, preserved as a positive hypichnion; B, interpretive drawing. Scale 100 mm, same throughout.
Figure 3. Close up of best preserved print of EBT, a left manus EBT1, as shown in . A, print; B, interpretive drawing. Scale 50 mm, same throughout.
Figure 4. Ichnofossils assigned to synapsid and crocodylomorph trackmakers comparison: A, Synaptichnium (from Avanzini & Mietto, Citation2008); B, Synaptichnium (King et al., Citation2005); C, Dicynodontipus (from Retallack, Citation1996); D, Sederipes ‘Morphotype C’ (from Stanford et al., Citation2018); E, ‘Morphotype Civ; (from Romano & Whyte, Citation2010); F, Crocodylopodus (from Lockley & Meyer, Citation2004); G, Pooleyichnus (from Sarjeant, Citation1975); H, Schadipes (from Lockley & Foster, Citation2003); I, Koreasaltipes (from Kim et al., Citation2017); J, Catocapes (from Mateus et al., Citation2017); K, Batrachopus, (from Avanzini et al., Citation2007); L, Ameghinichnus (from deValais, 2009). Scale equals 50 mm in C, same scale as in C for: C-D, F-H, J-L. Scale equals 100 mm in E. Scale equals 10 mm in I.
Figure 5. Simplified relationships and terminology for Synapsida (adapted from Angielczyk, Citation2009).
Table 1. Measurements of the well-preserved EBT1 manus print, alongside selected Permian and Mesozoic synapsid ichnogenera.
Figure 6. Measurements for ichnogenera attributed to selected Permian and Mesozoic trackmakers. Measurements in .
