7,462
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Trends in the multiple myeloma treatment landscape and survival: a U.S. analysis using 2011–2019 oncology clinic electronic health record data

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 377-386 | Received 26 Aug 2020, Accepted 08 Sep 2020, Published online: 07 Oct 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline demographic/clinical characteristics at multiple myeloma diagnosis.

Table 2. Number of patients in subgroups.

Figure 1. Multiple myeloma treatments over time. (A) Top regimens of multiple myeloma patients at line of therapy by treatment initiation year. The proportion of patients receiving different regimens is shown over time in 2-year increments from 2012 to 2019. Dex: dexamethasone; IMiD: immunomodulatory imide drug; MoAB: monoclonal antibody; PI: proteasome inhibitor. (B) Trends in line of therapy and regimen combinations by treatment initiation year. The proportion of patients receiving monotherapy, doublet, triplet, quad, or other regimens is shown over time in 2-year increments from 2012 to 2019.

Figure 1. Multiple myeloma treatments over time. (A) Top regimens of multiple myeloma patients at line of therapy by treatment initiation year. The proportion of patients receiving different regimens is shown over time in 2-year increments from 2012 to 2019. Dex: dexamethasone; IMiD: immunomodulatory imide drug; MoAB: monoclonal antibody; PI: proteasome inhibitor. (B) Trends in line of therapy and regimen combinations by treatment initiation year. The proportion of patients receiving monotherapy, doublet, triplet, quad, or other regimens is shown over time in 2-year increments from 2012 to 2019.

Figure 2. Multiple myeloma survival. (A) Trends in overall survival of multiple myeloma patients by line of therapy. Shown is survival by LOT 1 to LOT 5 for years 2011–2019. CI: confidence interval; LOT: line of therapy. (B) Trends in overall survival in frontline-treated multiple myeloma patients by year of diagnosis. Shown is survival for patients receiving first-line therapies by year of diagnosis, 2011–2012 or 2013–2014, i.e. for those years that had 5 years of follow-up data available, with the dotted line at the 5-year mark. CI: confidence interval.

Figure 2. Multiple myeloma survival. (A) Trends in overall survival of multiple myeloma patients by line of therapy. Shown is survival by LOT 1 to LOT 5 for years 2011–2019. CI: confidence interval; LOT: line of therapy. (B) Trends in overall survival in frontline-treated multiple myeloma patients by year of diagnosis. Shown is survival for patients receiving first-line therapies by year of diagnosis, 2011–2012 or 2013–2014, i.e. for those years that had 5 years of follow-up data available, with the dotted line at the 5-year mark. CI: confidence interval.

Figure 3. Trends in treatment duration of multiple myeloma patients by line of therapy. Shown is treatment duration by LOT for years 2011 to 2019. CI: confidence interval; LOT: line of therapy; NE: not estimable.

Figure 3. Trends in treatment duration of multiple myeloma patients by line of therapy. Shown is treatment duration by LOT for years 2011 to 2019. CI: confidence interval; LOT: line of therapy; NE: not estimable.
Supplemental material

GLAL-2020-1144-File007.docx

Download MS Word (73.3 KB)