3,580
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A 2:1 randomized, open-label, phase II study of selinexor vs. physician’s choice in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3192-3203 | Received 30 Sep 2020, Accepted 21 Jun 2021, Published online: 29 Jul 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline demographics in the intent-to-treat population.

Figure 1. Overall survival in the intent-to-treat population.

Figure 1. Overall survival in the intent-to-treat population.

Table 2. Secondary efficacy variables in the intent-to-treat population.

Figure 2. Overall survival in patients with and without CR plus CRi/CRp in the intent-to-treat population. mCRR = CR + CRi + CRp. CR: complete remission; CRi: complete remission with incomplete recovery; CRp: complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery; mCRR: modified complete remission rate; PC: treatment of physician’s choice.

Figure 2. Overall survival in patients with and without CR plus CRi/CRp in the intent-to-treat population. mCRR = CR + CRi + CRp. CR: complete remission; CRi: complete remission with incomplete recovery; CRp: complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery; mCRR: modified complete remission rate; PC: treatment of physician’s choice.

Table 3. Summary of TEAEs occurring in the safety population.

Table 4. Most common TEAEs occurring in ≥10% of patients in any treatment group in the safety population.

Supplemental material

ilal_a_1950706_sm2478.docx

Download MS Word (523.6 KB)

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary material.