1,585
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of central line salvage for mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI) management practices in patients with hematologic malignancies

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1455-1463 | Received 04 Aug 2021, Accepted 11 Dec 2021, Published online: 08 Jan 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Survey results on diagnostic and therapeutic practice variations for mucosal barrier injury blood stream infections among cancer centers.

Figure 1. Survey results on diagnostic and therapeutic practice variations for mucosal barrier injury blood stream infections among cancer centers.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients at the time of mucosal barrier injury blood stream infection.

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of mucosal barrier injury blood stream infection among allogeneic stem cell recipients (n = 38).

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of mucosal barrier injury blood stream infection among allogeneic stem cell recipients (n = 38).

Table 2. Pathogens Causing Mucosal Barrier Injury Blood Stream Infection.

Figure 3. Overall survival among patients who underwent catheter removal and salvage: (a) all cohort (n = 115). (b) patients admitted for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 38).

Figure 3. Overall survival among patients who underwent catheter removal and salvage: (a) all cohort (n = 115). (b) patients admitted for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 38).

Table 3. Outcomes of patients with mucosal barrier injury blood stream infection based on catheter management.

Supplemental material

GLAL-2021-0888-File005.docx

Download MS Word (19.2 KB)