![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
Abstract
This study compared the educational outcomes of the University of Tennessee College of Social Work’s online and traditional MSW programs (N = 345). Knowledge, skill, and satisfaction outcomes were compared for online and traditional students in 3 tracks: full-time, part-time, and advanced standing (AS). There were no significant differences between online and traditional students in any track for the majority of educational outcomes. Significant differences were found, however, in online and traditional students’ grade point averages (GPAs), field competency ratings, and satisfaction. Traditional AS students had higher GPAs; online part-time students received significantly higher ratings in 6 of 8 field competency ratings; and online AS students were more satisfied with faculty accessibility, helpfulness, and advising. Pedagogical and research outcomes are discussed.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Sherry M. Cummings
Sherry M. Cummings is associate dean and professor and Kate M. Chaffin is director of the master’s of science in social work (MSSW) program at the University of Tennessee.
Kate M. Chaffin
Sherry M. Cummings is associate dean and professor and Kate M. Chaffin is director of the master’s of science in social work (MSSW) program at the University of Tennessee.
Clifford Cockerham
Clifford Cockerham is director of Environmental Justice Programs at the Tennessee Alliance for Progress.