Figures & data
Figure 1. Stylized example of individual vs contextual effects. Dark dots represent cases from participant 1, clear dots from participant 2. Although participant 1 is less confident than 2, there is no effect of (average) individual confidence on the willingness to accept advice. There is, however, an effect of the contextual confidence: participants are less likely to accept advice for cases about which they are more confident (even though the case about which participant 1 is most confident, is a lower confidence level than even the lowest of participant 2).
![Figure 1. Stylized example of individual vs contextual effects. Dark dots represent cases from participant 1, clear dots from participant 2. Although participant 1 is less confident than 2, there is no effect of (average) individual confidence on the willingness to accept advice. There is, however, an effect of the contextual confidence: participants are less likely to accept advice for cases about which they are more confident (even though the case about which participant 1 is most confident, is a lower confidence level than even the lowest of participant 2).](/cms/asset/5afcf367-8b16-4cb4-833d-07e1fd415d77/hihc_a_2097601_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Visualizations of the estimated effects of individual and contextual confidence on trust (left: following advice; right: asking for advice).
![Figure 5. Visualizations of the estimated effects of individual and contextual confidence on trust (left: following advice; right: asking for advice).](/cms/asset/c0bc3c80-6e86-471a-b1e9-ecb57d5930cc/hihc_a_2097601_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 1. Multi-level logistic regression models for trust in advice and task performance.