126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Improving Error Correction and Text Editing Using Voice and Mouse Multimodal Interface

ORCID Icon &
Received 15 Aug 2023, Accepted 02 May 2024, Published online: 22 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Workflow of the fix task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 1. Workflow of the fix task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 2. Workflow of the fix + options task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 2. Workflow of the fix + options task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 3. Workflow of the replace task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 3. Workflow of the replace task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 4. Workflow of the copy task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 4. Workflow of the copy task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 5. Workflow of the paste task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 5. Workflow of the paste task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 6. Workflow of the add task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 6. Workflow of the add task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 7. Workflow of the delete task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 7. Workflow of the delete task using the three systems: voice-only (a), voice&gaze (b), and voice&mouse (c).

Figure 8. Experimental setup for the Teyepo system.

Figure 8. Experimental setup for the Teyepo system.

Table 1. The results of the separate three-way ANOVAs with repeated measures on the performance time and the task effort.

Figure 9. The average performance time as a function of the editing method and task.

Figure 9. The average performance time as a function of the editing method and task.

Figure 10. The average task effort as a function of the editing method and task.

Figure 10. The average task effort as a function of the editing method and task.

Figure 11. The average perceived NASA-TLX task load as a function of the editing method and task type.

Figure 11. The average perceived NASA-TLX task load as a function of the editing method and task type.

Figure 12. The average SUS score for each editing method.

Figure 12. The average SUS score for each editing method.

Figure 13. The preference score as a function of the editing method and task.

Figure 13. The preference score as a function of the editing method and task.