Abstract
In this commentary, stemming from Freud’s conflictual interest in psychic phenomena, I examine current views of telepathy as reflected in controversial parapsychological research and theories of nonlocal mind. I hope to inspire readers’ curiosity about the possible existence of telepathic communication by proposing clinical examples and raising the feasibility of the impact of the therapist’s own predisposition and belief system. Finally I speculate about how findings from parapsychology research in combination with findings from neuroscience and quantum theory might influence the evolution of psychoanalytically based practice methods in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to Cathleen Adams, Noelle Burton, Alan Frank, Barbara Freedgood, Adrienne Harris, Alan Kintzer, Maria Lechich, and Stacy Malin for their helpful comments on this paper.
Notes
1 “Psi” is a term coined in 1942 by British psychologist Thouless for parapsychological manifestations, derived from the Greek word psyche, for ‘mind’ or ‘soul,’ referring to psychic experiences ranging from clairvoyance to precognition, telepathy, and psychokinesis. The term “paranormal” was adopted in the 1930s by J. B. Rhine to replace “psychical research.”
2 See CitationAllik, 2003; CitationBalsam & Harris, 2012; CitationBass, 2001, Citation2004; CitationBerlin, 2011; CitationBromberg, 1998, Citation2006, Citation2011; CitationEigen, 1981; CitationGallese, 2006; CitationHarris, 2002, Citation2004; CitationLoewald, 1978; CitationMayer, 2007; CitationSchore, 2003, and others.
3 Dean Radin, Ph.D., is a researcher and author in the field of parapsychology. He is Chief Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) and Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Psychology at Sonoma State University.
4 Marilyn Schlitz, Ph.D., is a research scientist and medical anthropologist, former president and CEO of IONS from 2009 to 2012.
5 See CitationTarg and Puthoff (1974), and other researchers including D. Behm, W. Braud, B. Dunne, C. Honorton, R. Jahn, E. Mitchell, A. Parker, M. Persinger, D. Radin, J. Rhine, M. Schlitz, R. Sheldrake, and P. Tressoldi.
6 In the ganzfeld method the “receiver” relaxes in a controlled environment deprived of sensory input, reclining in a comfortable chair with halved Ping-Pong balls over the eyes, listening to pink noise or whooshing sounds through headphones while the “sender” in a distant room repeatedly views short video clips and tries to mentally “send” them. The “receiver” is repeatedly shown four different video clips in random order (the actual target and three decoys), and describes out loud his or her impressions. The probability that the “receiver” will succeed in guessing the actual target correctly is one in four, or 25% (see CitationRadin, 2003).
11 Recent psychoanalytic authors exploring telepathic themes include CitationBass (2001), CitationBlechner (1994), CitationBromberg (2011), CitationEshel (2006, Citation2010), CitationLazar (2001), CitationMayer (2001, Citation2007), CitationRosenbaum (2011), CitationSands (2010), CitationSuchet (2004), and CitationTennes (2007).
14 Einstein’s famous slight describing occurrences when the observation of one object instantaneously influences the behavior of another object at a distance, with no physical force connecting the two.
15 For explanations of quantum theory, see Bohm, Planck, Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödiger, and more recently Feynman, Penrose, Hawking, and Kaku.
16 See CitationRadin’s (2006) Entangled Minds, in which he extends Schrödinger’s entanglement theory proposing that the interconnected nature of reality at the quantum level gives rise to psi phenomena.
17 For example, CitationAltman (2002, Citation2007), CitationBass (2001), CitationBromberg (2011), CitationEshel (2006), CitationHarris (2004), CitationLazar (2001), CitationMayer (2007), CitationRosenbaum (2011), CitationSuchet (2004), and CitationTennes (2007).
18 See CitationMayer’s (2007) experience of having her own mind changed by the anomalous relocation of her daughter’s harp.
19 de Peyer, J. Raising the curtain: Unconscious communication and the uncanny. Paper presented at IARPP, Madrid, Spain, 2011, and presented at the NIP, New York, NY, 2013.
22 D. Behm, W. Braud, B. Dunne, C. Honorton, R. Jahn, E. Mitchell, A. Parker, M. Persinger, D. Radin, J. Rhine, M. Schlitz, P. Tressoldi, and R. Sheldrake.
23 Professor of Psychology and head of Neuroscience Research Group, Laurentian University, Canada.
28 For example, Steven Halpern’s “Inner Peace Music.”
29 For example, BioLateral™ Sounds.
Allik, T. (2003). Psychoanalysis and the uncanny: Take two OR When disillutionment turns out to be an illusion. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 26, 3–37. Balsam, R., & Harris, A. (2012). Maternal embodiment: A conversation between Rosemary Balsam and Adrienne Harris. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 13, 33–52. Bass, A. (2001). It takes one to know one: or, Whose unconscious is it anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 683–702. Bass, A. (2004). “Imagine, I am a great soothsayer”—The future is now: Commentary on Melanie Suchet’s “Whose Mind Is It Anyway?” Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 303–316. Berlin, H. (2011). The neural basis of the dynamic unconscious. Neuropsychoanalysis, 13, 5–31. Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. Bromberg, P. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. Bromberg, P. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami: And the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge. Eigen, M. (1981). Comments on snakes symbolism and mind-body relations. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 73–79. Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunment: Embodied simulation and its role in social cognition. In M. Mancia (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and neuroscience (pp. 269–301). New York, NY: Springer. Harris, A. (2002). Minds and dialogues in analytic spaces—Negotiating certainty and uncertainty: Reply to commentary. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 1001–1017. Harris, A. (2004). Haunted bodies: Commentary on Melanie Suchet’s “Whose Mind Is It Anyway?” Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 289–302. Loewald, H. W. (1978). Instinct theory, object relations, and psychic-structure formation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 26, 493–506. Mayer, E. L. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: Science, skepticism, and the inexplicable powers of the human mind. New York, NY: Bantam. Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: Norton. Targ, R., & Puthoff, H. E. (1974). Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding. Nature, 252, 602–607. Radin, D. I. (2003). Thinking about telepathy. Think, 3, 23–32. Radin, D. I. (2003). Thinking about telepathy. Think, 3, 23–32. Pratt, J. G., & Rhine, J. B. (1967). Extra-sensory Perception after sixty years: A critical appraisal of the research in extra-sensory perception. Boston, MA: Bruce Humphries. (Original work published 1940) Radin, D. (1997). The conscious universe: The scientific truth of psychic phenomena. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers. Radin, D. I. (2006). Entangled minds. Paraview. Radin, D. I. (2013). Supernormal: Sciene, yoga, and the evidence for extraordinary psychic abilities. Deepak Chopra Books, New York, NY: Random House. Mishlove, J. (1980). Parapsychology research: Interview with Ray Hyman. Skeptical Inquirer, 1, 63–67. Radin, D. I. (2006). Entangled minds. Paraview. Milton, J., & Wiseman, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387–391. Bass, A. (2001). It takes one to know one: or, Whose unconscious is it anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 683–702. Blechner, M. J. (1994). Projective identification, countertransference, and the “maybe-me.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 30, 619–630. Bromberg, P. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami: And the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge. Eshel, O. (2006). Where are you, my beloved?: On absence, loss, and the enigma of telepathic dreams. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 1603–1627. Eshel, O. (2010). Patient–analyst interconnectedness: Personal notes on close encounters of a new dimension. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 146–154. Lazar, S. G. (2001). Knowing, influencing, and healing: Paranormal phenomena and implications for psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 21, 113–131. Mayer, E. L. (2001). On “telepathic dreams?”: An unpublished paper by Robert J. Stoller. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49, 629–652. Mayer, E. L. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: Science, skepticism, and the inexplicable powers of the human mind. New York, NY: Bantam. Rosenbaum, R. (2011). Exploring the other Dark Continent: Parallels between psi phenomena and the process of change in psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 57–90. Sands, S. H. (2010). On the royal road together: The analytic function of dreams in activating dissociative unconscious communication. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 357–373. Suchet, M. (2004). Whose mind is it anyway? Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 259–287. Tennes, M. (2007). Beyond intersubjectivity: The transpersonal dimension of the psychoanalytic encounter. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43, 505–525. Mancia, M., & Longhin, L. (2000). Kant’s philosophy and its relationship with the thought of Bion and Money-Kyrle. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81, 1197–1211. Meissner, W. W. (2003). Mind, brain, and self in psychoanalysis: III. Psychoanalytic perspectives after Freud. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 26, 345–386. Schore, A. N. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 1–2. Schwartz, A. (1988), Reification revisited: Some neurobiologically filtered views of psychic structure and conflicts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36(Suppl.), 259–385. Solms, M. (1997). Review of Damasio’s Descartes’ Error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45, 959–964. Taylor, R. (1991). Metaphysics (Foundations of Philosophy Series, 4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Radin, D. I. (2006). Entangled minds. Paraview. Altman, N. (2002). Where is the action in the “talking cure”? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 38, 499–513. Altman, N. (2007). Integrating the transpersonal with the intersubjective: Commentary on Mary Tennes’ “Beyond Intersubjectivity.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43, 526–535. Bass, A. (2001). It takes one to know one: or, Whose unconscious is it anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 683–702. Bromberg, P. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami: And the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge. Eshel, O. (2006). Where are you, my beloved?: On absence, loss, and the enigma of telepathic dreams. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 1603–1627. Harris, A. (2004). Haunted bodies: Commentary on Melanie Suchet’s “Whose Mind Is It Anyway?” Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 289–302. Lazar, S. G. (2001). Knowing, influencing, and healing: Paranormal phenomena and implications for psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 21, 113–131. Mayer, E. L. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: Science, skepticism, and the inexplicable powers of the human mind. New York, NY: Bantam. Rosenbaum, R. (2011). Exploring the other Dark Continent: Parallels between psi phenomena and the process of change in psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 57–90. Suchet, M. (2004). Whose mind is it anyway? Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 259–287. Tennes, M. (2007). Beyond intersubjectivity: The transpersonal dimension of the psychoanalytic encounter. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43, 505–525. Mayer, E. L. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: Science, skepticism, and the inexplicable powers of the human mind. New York, NY: Bantam. Altman, N. (2002). Where is the action in the “talking cure”? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 38, 499–513. Altman, N. (2007). Integrating the transpersonal with the intersubjective: Commentary on Mary Tennes’ “Beyond Intersubjectivity.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43, 526–535. Bass, A. (2001). It takes one to know one: or, Whose unconscious is it anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 683–702. Eshel, O. (2006). Where are you, my beloved?: On absence, loss, and the enigma of telepathic dreams. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 1603–1627. Harris, A. (2004). Haunted bodies: Commentary on Melanie Suchet’s “Whose Mind Is It Anyway?” Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 289–302. Mayer, E. L. (2007). Extraordinary knowing: Science, skepticism, and the inexplicable powers of the human mind. New York, NY: Bantam. Rosenbaum, R. (2011). Exploring the other Dark Continent: Parallels between psi phenomena and the process of change in psychotherapy. Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 57–90. Suchet, M. (2004). Whose mind is it anyway? Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 5, 259–287. Tennes, M. (2007). Beyond intersubjectivity: The transpersonal dimension of the psychoanalytic encounter. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43, 505–525. Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York, NY: Wiley. Freud, S. (1904 [1903]). Freud’s psycho-analytic procedure. Standard Edition, 7, 247–254. Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 11, 1–56. Radin, D. I. (2003). Thinking about telepathy. Think, 3, 23–32. Parnell, L. (2006). A therapist’s guide to EMDR: Tools and techniques for successful treatment. New York, NY: Norton. Shapiro, F. (1989). Eye movement desensitization: A new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 211–217. Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols and procedures (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. Fosha, D. (2002). The activation of affective change processes in AEDT (Accelerated Experiential-Dynamic Psychotherapy). In J. J. Magnavita (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy (Vol. 1, pp. 309–344). New York, NY: Wiley. Gendlin, E. T. (1996). Focusing-oriented psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford. Schwartz, R. C. (2001). Introduction to the internal family systems model. Oak Park, IL: Trailheads. Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma: The innate capacity to transform overwhelming experiences. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books. Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. New York, NY: Norton. Abraham, R., & Shaw, C. (1992). Dynamics: The geometry of behavior (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2009). Good vibrations: Analytic process as coupled oscillations. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 90, 983–1007. Harris, A. (2009). “You must remember this”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 2–21. Cade, C. M., & Coxhead, N. (1988). The awakened mind. London, UK: Wildwood House. Field, N. (1992). The therapeutic function of altered states. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 37, 211–234. Glueck, B. C., & Stroebel, C. F. (1975). Biofeedback and meditation in the treatment of psychiatric illnesses. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 16, 303–321. Kasamatsu, A., & Hirai, T. (1969). An electroencephalographic study on the Zen meditation (Zazen). In C. Tart (Ed.), Altered states of consciousness (pp. 489-501). New York, NY: John Wiley. Lesh, T. V. (1970), Zen meditation and the development of empathy in counselors. Journal of Human Psychology, 10, 39–74. LeShan, L. (1974). The medium, the mystic and the physicist. London, UK: Turnstone Books. Shafii, M. (1973). Adaptive and therapeutic aspects of meditation. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 2, 364–382. Tart, C. T. (2009). The end of materialism: How evidence of the paranormal is bringing science and spirit together. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger. Brown, R. P., & Gerbarg, P. (2012). The healing power of the breath: Simple techniques to reduce stress and anxiety, enhance concentration, and balance your emotions. Boston, MA: Shambhala. Radin, D. I., Stone, J., Levine, E., Eskandarnejad, S., Schlitz, M., Kozak, L., … Hayssen, G. (2008). Compassionate intention as a therapeutic intervention by partners of cancer patients: Effects of distant intention on the patients’ autonomic nervous system. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 4, 235–243. Schmidt, S., Scheider, R., Utts, J., & Walach, H. (2004). Distant intentionality and the feeling of being stared at: Two meta-analyses. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 235. Baranger, M., & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 89, 795–826. Katz, S. M. (2013). General psychoanalytic field theory: Its structure and applications to psychoanalytic perspectives. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 277–292. Ghent, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: Motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Edelman’s selectionist theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 763–808. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Barron, G. C. (2003). Silent thoughts, spoken wishes: When candidate experience of the supervisor converges with patient fantasies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 155–175. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton. Ullman, M. (1973b). Societal factors in dreaming. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 9, 282–293. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Janine de Peyer
Janine de Peyer, LCSW, is Faculty and Supervisor at the National Institute for the Psychotherapies, NY, and at the Stephen Mitchell Center for Relational Studies. She is an Associate Editor of Psychoanalytic Dialogues
and is in private practice in New York City.