![Sample our Law journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5942/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Law.jpg"})
Abstract
Prison animal programs have been rapidly becoming commonplace in many correctional facilities around the world. However, the research on their effects are still forthcoming. This study analyzes the effect of prison animal programs on inmates’ perceptions on the pains/strains of imprisonment through the use of surveys given to a diverse group of male inmates at three South Carolina correctional facilities. Results indicate that both direct and indirect contact with animals (dogs, cats, horses, cattle and bees) leads to a reduction in their perceptions of the pains/strains of imprisonment when compared to a similar group of inmates with no animal contact. These findings have important policy implications for correctional administrators regarding the use of animals to reduce inmate discontent.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the South Carolina Department of Correction, specifically the Wardens, Associate Wardens and correctional staff at Allendale C.I., Wateree C.I. and Perry C.I. for allowing me into their facilities to conduct my research, without which, this study would not be possible. This research was conducted through the cooperation of the South Carolina Department of Corrections.
Notes
1 Data was also collected from Camille Graham C.I. (medium security, female institution with a Greyhound Rescue Program) but these data were dropped from analysis due to the small sample size (n = 10) of female offenders.
2 Reasoning for placement in the control group is provided below in the Independent Variables section
3 Survey available upon request
4 To save space, the control variables were not included in the tables, full tables available upon request