Figures & data
Table 1 Logistic regression model predicting likelihood of answering TTIP question correctly.
Figure 1. Predicted probability of knowing what TTIP means with increasing levels of ZML consumption per month.
![Figure 1. Predicted probability of knowing what TTIP means with increasing levels of ZML consumption per month.](/cms/asset/c6409793-5f8e-42d8-b3c6-cb94acf7293d/upcp_a_1498816_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Structural equation model predicting the relationships between satire exposure, the feeling of being informed, and subsequent indicators of the public agenda.
Note: For reasons of clarity, covariances that were specified between all exogenous variables and error terms of the endogenous variables were not visualized. *** p < .001. ** p < .010. * p < .050.
![Figure 2. Structural equation model predicting the relationships between satire exposure, the feeling of being informed, and subsequent indicators of the public agenda.Note: For reasons of clarity, covariances that were specified between all exogenous variables and error terms of the endogenous variables were not visualized. *** p < .001. ** p < .010. * p < .050.](/cms/asset/9c5917b0-1c0a-4e00-b0d0-b314a25fb70d/upcp_a_1498816_f0002_b.gif)
Table 2 ARIMA model predicting the salience of TTIP on the public, media, and political agenda.
Figure 3. Visual overview of time series: public (dashed, black), media (solid, red) and political agenda (dotted, blue).
Note: Zondag met Lubach (ZML) broadcasts on TTIP aired in 2015, weeks 12 and 41.
![Figure 3. Visual overview of time series: public (dashed, black), media (solid, red) and political agenda (dotted, blue).Note: Zondag met Lubach (ZML) broadcasts on TTIP aired in 2015, weeks 12 and 41.](/cms/asset/821c1e84-9804-4efe-b63e-94f2c7234ab6/upcp_a_1498816_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table A1 Model fit of ARIMA models predicting, respectively, the public, media, or political agenda while applying different decay functions.