1,629
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adventures in Supersingularland

, , , , , & show all

Figures & data

Fig. 1 The graph G2(Fp) for p = 431 (case 3.a of Theorem 3.5). The vertices are labeled by j-invariants of each curve. Each component is a volcano, with an inner ring of surface curves and the outer vertices all being curves on the floor. The class number of Q(431) is 3·7=21 and the orders of the two primes above 2 are 7.

Fig. 1 The graph G2(Fp) for p = 431 (case 3.a of Theorem 3.5). The vertices are labeled by j-invariants of each curve. Each component is a volcano, with an inner ring of surface curves and the outer vertices all being curves on the floor. The class number of Q(−431) is 3·7=21 and the orders of the two primes above 2 are 7.

Fig. 2 Stacking, folding and attaching by an edge for p = 431 and l=2. The leftmost component of G2(Fp) folds, the other two components stack, and the vertices 189 and 150 get attached by a double edge.

Fig. 2 Stacking, folding and attaching by an edge for p = 431 and l=2. The leftmost component of G2(Fp) folds, the other two components stack, and the vertices 189 and 150 get attached by a double edge.

Fig. 3 Attachment along a j-invariant for p = 83 and l=3. The two connected components of G3(Fp) are attached along the j-invariant 68=1728 mod 83. There are two outgoing double edges from j = 1728 but because of the extra automorphisms, these edges are identified in the undirected graph.

Fig. 3 Attachment along a j-invariant for p = 83 and l=3. The two connected components of G3(Fp) are attached along the j-invariant 68=1728 mod 83. There are two outgoing double edges from j = 1728 but because of the extra automorphisms, these edges are identified in the undirected graph.

Fig. 4 Attachment by an edge that does not attach two distinct components. This component folds and the vertices with j-invariants 68 and 107 are joined by a double edge.

Fig. 4 Attachment by an edge that does not attach two distinct components. This component folds and the vertices with j-invariants 68 and 107 are joined by a double edge.

Fig. 5 The graph G3(Fp) for p = 179. We see that the neighbors of vertices with j-invariant 0 both have j-invariant 12288000 mod 179=171.

Fig. 5 The graph G3(Fp) for p = 179. We see that the neighbors of vertices with j-invariant 0 both have j-invariant −12288000 mod 179=171.

Fig. 6 Possible shapes for G2(Fp) for p1 mod 4 (left) and p3 mod 8.

Fig. 6 Possible shapes for G2(Fp) for p≡1 mod 4 (left) and p≡3 mod 8.

Fig. 7 The double edge from j to j.

Fig. 7 The double edge from j to j′.

Fig. 8 Comparing average distances between random vertices in G2(F¯p) and between connected components of SG2(F¯p). On the horizontal axis, we have primes p1 mod 4. The height of each point represents (avg. distance between Fp-components) - (avg. distance between 100 random points of G2(F¯p)).

Fig. 8 Comparing average distances between random vertices in G2(F¯p) and between connected components of S⊂G2(F¯p). On the horizontal axis, we have primes p≡1 mod 4. The height of each point represents (avg. distance between Fp-components) - (avg. distance between 100 random points of G2(F¯p)).

Table 1 Size and shape of the spine, depending on primes modulo 8, the integer n denotes the order of any prime above 2 in cl(OK).

Fig. 9 Histogram of distances measured between conjugate pairs and arbitrary pairs of vertices not in Fp for the prime p=19,489.

Fig. 9 Histogram of distances measured between conjugate pairs and arbitrary pairs of vertices not in Fp for the prime p=19,489.

Fig. 10 Histogram of distances between 1000 randomly sampled pairs of arbitrary and conjugate vertices for the prime p=1,000,003.

Fig. 10 Histogram of distances between 1000 randomly sampled pairs of arbitrary and conjugate vertices for the prime p=1,000,003.

Fig. 11 Proportions of vertex pairs that are opposite; x-axis represents primes. The data are for a random sample of 1000 pairs of conjugate and arbitrary pairs.

Fig. 11 Proportions of vertex pairs that are opposite; x-axis represents primes. The data are for a random sample of 1000 pairs of conjugate and arbitrary pairs.

Fig. 12 The horizontal axes of these figures are primes. The heights are proportions of 1000 pairs of arbitrary vertices which are opposite, normalized by |S|.

Fig. 12 The horizontal axes of these figures are primes. The heights are proportions of 1000 pairs of arbitrary vertices which are opposite, normalized by |S|.

Fig. 13 Normalized proportion of pairs with a shortest path through the specified subgraph, as p varies.

Fig. 13 Normalized proportion of pairs with a shortest path through the specified subgraph, as p varies.

Fig. 14 Distances to the spine S contrasted with distances to a random subgraph R of the same size. The spine S is connected for p = 19, 991 and a union of disconnected edges for p = 19, 993.

Fig. 14 Distances to the spine S contrasted with distances to a random subgraph R of the same size. The spine S is connected for p = 19, 991 and a union of disconnected edges for p = 19, 993.

Fig. 15 Normalized average distances dp to the spine S, as prime p varies on the horizontal axes.

Fig. 15 Normalized average distances dp to the spine S, as prime p varies on the horizontal axes.

Fig. 16 Size of the spine as prime p varies on the horizontal axes.

Fig. 16 Size of the spine as prime p varies on the horizontal axes.

Fig. 17 Proportion of 2-isogenous conjugate pairs in G2(F¯p) for 10,007p100,193.

Fig. 17 Proportion of 2-isogenous conjugate pairs in G2(F¯p) for 10,007≤p≤100,193.

Table 2 Proportions of 2-isogenous conjugates, 10007p100193, sorted by p mod 12.

Fig. 18 Proportion of 3-isogenous conjugate pairs in G2(F¯p) for 10,007p10,0193.

Fig. 18 Proportion of 3-isogenous conjugate pairs in G2(F¯p) for 10,007≤p≤10,0193.

Table 3 Proportions of 3-isogenous conjugates for 10007p100193, sorted by p mod 12.

Fig. 19 Diameter of G2(F¯p) for 4600 primes p with 1009p9,501,511 with y=log2(p/12)+1+log2(12) (dashed), y=4/3log2(p/12)+1 (solid) and the proven lower bound y=log2(p/12)log2(3)+1 (dotted).

Fig. 19 Diameter of G2(F¯p) for 4600 primes p with 1009≤p≤9,501,511 with y= log 2(p/12)+1+ log 2(12) (dashed), y=4/3 log 2(p/12)+1 (solid) and the proven lower bound y= log 2(p/12)− log 2(3)+1 (dotted).

Fig. 20 Lower bounds on the diameter of G2(F¯p) for 431 primes p23 mod 24 with 1020431<p<15201671, along with the graphs of y=log2(p/12)+α (dashed), y=4/3log2(p/12)+β (solid).

Fig. 20 Lower bounds on the diameter of G2(F¯p) for 431 primes p≡23 mod 24 with 1020431<p<15201671, along with the graphs of y= log 2(p/12)+α (dashed), y=4/3 log 2(p/12)+β (solid).

Fig. 21 Diameters of 2-isogeny graph over F¯p for different congruence classes of the prime p, shown with y=log2(p/12)+log2(12)+1

Fig. 21 Diameters of 2-isogeny graph over F¯p for different congruence classes of the prime p, shown with y= log 2(p/12)+ log 2(12)+1

Table 4 Average diameters sorted by primes modulo 12.