6,645
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Pharmacotherapy in COVID-19 patients: a review of ACE2-raising drugs and their clinical safety

, , , , &
Pages 683-699 | Received 29 Jun 2020, Accepted 15 Jul 2020, Published online: 12 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. ACE2 as a key component of the RAAS and as the cell surface receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The RAAS comprises two ‘arms’ or pathways that are opposing or counter-regulating in their actions and it is their relative balance that determines the physiological/pathological consequences. This simplified schematic shows that upon conversion of Angiotensinogen into Angiotensin 1 by renin, the octapeptide Angiotensin II (Ang II) is produced by the action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on Angiotensin I that can exert its actions via the AT1 receptor (AT1R). Ang II can also be converted by ACE2 to Angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-1-7) that can act via it Mas receptor (MasR). The predominance of the ACE-Ang II- AT1 receptor ‘arm’ or pathway leads to actions such as vasoconstriction, cell proliferation, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signals whereas the activation of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-MasR pathway leads to opposing actions of vasodilation, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic signals. In addition to its role in RAAS, ACE2 is the receptor by which SARS-CoV-2 gains entry into human cells. Endocytosis of the complex between ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 viral particles may lead to a reduction in membrane-bound ACE2 levels. Membrane-bound ACE2 can be shed as a soluble form of ACE2 (ACE2s) following cleavage by a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM-17). ACE2s retains it biological activity and might also act as a ‘decoy’ receptor to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 binding to the intended membrane-bound ACE2 receptor. The sites of action for ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)-routinely used for treating hypertension and cardiovascular diseases- are shown and these drugs are known to raise ACE2 levels in various fluids/tissues in vivo. Overall balance of ACE2 levels on cells or in body fluids will be dependent on the balance of its synthesis, shedding and/or degradation. The potential interplay of SARS-CoV-2 and the impact of ACE2-rasing medications in COVID-19 patients and the potential implications for shifting the balance between the different ‘arms’ of RAAS is further discussed in the main text.

Figure 1. ACE2 as a key component of the RAAS and as the cell surface receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The RAAS comprises two ‘arms’ or pathways that are opposing or counter-regulating in their actions and it is their relative balance that determines the physiological/pathological consequences. This simplified schematic shows that upon conversion of Angiotensinogen into Angiotensin 1 by renin, the octapeptide Angiotensin II (Ang II) is produced by the action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on Angiotensin I that can exert its actions via the AT1 receptor (AT1R). Ang II can also be converted by ACE2 to Angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-1-7) that can act via it Mas receptor (MasR). The predominance of the ACE-Ang II- AT1 receptor ‘arm’ or pathway leads to actions such as vasoconstriction, cell proliferation, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signals whereas the activation of the ACE2-Ang-(1-7)-MasR pathway leads to opposing actions of vasodilation, anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic signals. In addition to its role in RAAS, ACE2 is the receptor by which SARS-CoV-2 gains entry into human cells. Endocytosis of the complex between ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 viral particles may lead to a reduction in membrane-bound ACE2 levels. Membrane-bound ACE2 can be shed as a soluble form of ACE2 (ACE2s) following cleavage by a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM-17). ACE2s retains it biological activity and might also act as a ‘decoy’ receptor to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 binding to the intended membrane-bound ACE2 receptor. The sites of action for ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)-routinely used for treating hypertension and cardiovascular diseases- are shown and these drugs are known to raise ACE2 levels in various fluids/tissues in vivo. Overall balance of ACE2 levels on cells or in body fluids will be dependent on the balance of its synthesis, shedding and/or degradation. The potential interplay of SARS-CoV-2 and the impact of ACE2-rasing medications in COVID-19 patients and the potential implications for shifting the balance between the different ‘arms’ of RAAS is further discussed in the main text.

Table 1. Examples of experimental studies providing evidence of raised ACE2 mRNA expression, protein levels and/or activity with clinically used medications.

Table 2. Examples of clinical studies showing that COVID-19 patients taking ACEIs/ARBs are not associated with increased risk of either a) infection, b) severity of COVID-19 disease, c) risk of admission to hospital or d) mortality.

Figure 2. Re-analysis of data from the meta-analysis of Zhang X et al [Citation119] on the association between ACEIs/ARBs use, irrespective of clinical indication, and all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients using a robust model. Forest plots of the meta-analysis with (A) and without (B) Mehra et al [Citation121] data sets. Doi plots with Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index values are also shown for re-analysed data with (C) and without (D) Mehra et al [Citation121] data sets. Note that LFK index of greater than 2 suggests major asymmetry.

Figure 2. Re-analysis of data from the meta-analysis of Zhang X et al [Citation119] on the association between ACEIs/ARBs use, irrespective of clinical indication, and all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients using a robust model. Forest plots of the meta-analysis with (A) and without (B) Mehra et al [Citation121] data sets. Doi plots with Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index values are also shown for re-analysed data with (C) and without (D) Mehra et al [Citation121] data sets. Note that LFK index of greater than 2 suggests major asymmetry.