![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
Decision support for selecting suitable QSARs for predictive purposes is suggested by a stepwise procedure: The first tier pre-filters the compounds based on substructure indicators for baseline versus excess toxicity. This step, if sufficiently conservative, discriminates chemicals, whose toxicity can be reliably estimated from their log K OW from those, that require further classification by biological and chemical domain. A test set of 115 chemicals from 9 different MOA classes was used to compare the discriminatory power of several classification schemes based on substructure indicators. Performance, evaluated by contingency table statistics, is varied and no single scheme provides sufficient applicability and reliability for pre-filtering chemical inventories. Major improvements are feasible with combined use of three classification schemes: assignments of baseline toxicants are protective, recognition of excess toxicants is acceptable and applicability range increases favourably.
§Presented at the 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Structure--Activity Relationships in Environmental Toxicology (QSAR2006), 8--12 May 2006, Lyon, France.
Notes
§Presented at the 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Structure--Activity Relationships in Environmental Toxicology (QSAR2006), 8--12 May 2006, Lyon, France.