699
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Invited Reviews

Plasticizers in the neonatal intensive care unit: A review on exposure sources and health hazards

, , , &
Pages 3947-3972 | Published online: 02 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

Plasticizers, used to increase the flexibility of plastic materials, can leach into the environment and the human body. Various adverse health effects are attributed to exposure to plasticizers, particularly phthalates. Premature newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are exposed to many indwelling plastic devices containing plasticizers while in a developmentally vulnerable period. This is the first comprehensive review of its kind, providing an overview of DEHP and alternative plasticizers (APs), their sources and degree of exposure in the NICU, and the resulting health risks in (premature) infants. Despite the 2017 EU Medical Devices Regulation (2017/745), di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is still a commonly present plasticizer in plastic medical devices in the NICU, with current labeling being insufficient to guarantee absence. Estimated NICU exposures remain elevated above the tolerable daily intake. Medical procedures leading to the highest exposure of phthalates and APs, are extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition and respiratory support. As traditional matrices, such as blood and urine, are not always readily available in neonates, the accumulation of plasticizers in alternative matrices, such as hair and nails, provides an opportunity to study long-term accumulation of toxic chemicals. Impaired respiratory and neurodevelopment correlate with phthalate exposure at both biological and epidemiological levels in childhood, yet knowledge gaps about the effects in neonates prevail. Some APs provide interesting opportunities to reduce toxicity, but human data regarding health effects remain limited. Although toxicologists and regulators have addressed the problem for some time, awareness is lacking mainly among healthcare professionals.

Graphical Abstract

HANDLING EDITORS:

Disclosure statement

The authors report no competing interests.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by “The Research Foundation—Flanders-Belgium (FWO)” under Grant numbers 1S70820N and G074421N. Lucas Panneel acknowledges the funding of a PhD fellowship from the University of Antwerp.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 652.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.