Figures & data
Figure 1. Design of the PF@MTX NP nanodelivery system and its process of exerting an anti-OS effect.
![Figure 1. Design of the PF@MTX NP nanodelivery system and its process of exerting an anti-OS effect.](/cms/asset/03d129e4-6688-4210-ab8a-35b6a1dba138/ymte_a_2362572_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Toxicity of MTX (a), PF (b) and both drugs (c) in 143B cells. (d) Combination synergy score analysis using SynergyFinder 3.0. n = 3 independent experiments; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 represent significant differences.
![Figure 2. Toxicity of MTX (a), PF (b) and both drugs (c) in 143B cells. (d) Combination synergy score analysis using SynergyFinder 3.0. n = 3 independent experiments; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 represent significant differences.](/cms/asset/111db916-d27e-4504-97f1-6e83551e33a7/ymte_a_2362572_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. IC50 of MTX and PF.
Figure 3. Synthesis of materials, FTIR spectra of MTX, γ-PGA, s-s, MTX-ss-NH2, MTX-ss-PGA on the left and 1 H NMR of MTX, γ-PGA, s-s, MTX-ss-NH2, MTX-ss-PGA on the right.
![Figure 3. Synthesis of materials, FTIR spectra of MTX, γ-PGA, s-s, MTX-ss-NH2, MTX-ss-PGA on the left and 1 H NMR of MTX, γ-PGA, s-s, MTX-ss-NH2, MTX-ss-PGA on the right.](/cms/asset/922ac72f-5cfd-46a9-ac4b-3aa5576033d1/ymte_a_2362572_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. The particle sizes of MTX NPs (a) and PF@MTX NPs (c) and zeta potential MTX NPs (b) and PF@MTX NPs (d). TEM of MTX NPs (e) and PF@MTX NPs (f). n = 3 independent experiments.
![Figure 4. The particle sizes of MTX NPs (a) and PF@MTX NPs (c) and zeta potential MTX NPs (b) and PF@MTX NPs (d). TEM of MTX NPs (e) and PF@MTX NPs (f). n = 3 independent experiments.](/cms/asset/b1de0089-b209-4c5a-9d89-bde8ff1bcbfb/ymte_a_2362572_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Size and zeta of MTX NPs and PF@MTX NPs.
Figure 5. MTX (left) and PF (right) release of PF@MTX NPs in physiological conditions (pH 7.4) or simulated tumour endosomal microenvironment (pH 5.5, 10 mM GSH) during 48 hours. n = 3 independent experiments.
![Figure 5. MTX (left) and PF (right) release of PF@MTX NPs in physiological conditions (pH 7.4) or simulated tumour endosomal microenvironment (pH 5.5, 10 mM GSH) during 48 hours. n = 3 independent experiments.](/cms/asset/a9d80cc8-98aa-4006-bbad-1128a63ed2c3/ymte_a_2362572_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. (a) and (d) shows the toxicity of various drugs on 143B cells; (b) shows the colony formation of 143B cells; (c) shows the colony formation rate of each group; (e)MTX NPs and PF@MTX NPs, (f) free MTX and free PF show the cytotoxicity of each group of drugs on HSF fibroblasts. n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 indicate significant differences.
![Figure 6. (a) and (d) shows the toxicity of various drugs on 143B cells; (b) shows the colony formation of 143B cells; (c) shows the colony formation rate of each group; (e)MTX NPs and PF@MTX NPs, (f) free MTX and free PF show the cytotoxicity of each group of drugs on HSF fibroblasts. n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 indicate significant differences.](/cms/asset/1de39d03-3e89-4b7f-acf6-815a0c662365/ymte_a_2362572_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Cellular uptake of the nanodrug PF@MTX NPs at different times with a CY5/PF@MTX NP concentration of 10 µg/mL and DAPI concentration of 1 µg/mL. n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 represent significant differences.
![Figure 7. Cellular uptake of the nanodrug PF@MTX NPs at different times with a CY5/PF@MTX NP concentration of 10 µg/mL and DAPI concentration of 1 µg/mL. n = 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 represent significant differences.](/cms/asset/2514d45d-7190-4c15-87d0-b7d945df5bd2/ymte_a_2362572_f0007_oc.jpg)
Data availability statement
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.