445
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Aerodynamic data modeling using support vector machines

, &
Pages 261-278 | Received 10 Aug 2004, Accepted 01 Oct 2004, Published online: 31 Aug 2006

Figures & data

Figure 1. Geometry and specifications of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 1. Geometry and specifications of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 2. Training data and testing data for performance-prediction of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 2. Training data and testing data for performance-prediction of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 3. Configuration of the five-hole pressure probe and its coordinate system.

Figure 3. Configuration of the five-hole pressure probe and its coordinate system.

Figure 4. Training data and testing data for calibration of the five-hole pressure probe.

Figure 4. Training data and testing data for calibration of the five-hole pressure probe.

Figure 5. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of performance-prediction of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 5. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of performance-prediction of the prototypic mixer.

Figure 6. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – calibration.

Figure 6. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – calibration.

Figure 7. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the static-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 7. Testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the static-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 8. Extended testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the total-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 8. Extended testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the total-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 9. Extended testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the total-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 9. Extended testing results of the SVM and the NN in the case of calibration of the five-hole pressure probe – the total-pressure-coefficient calibration.

Figure 10. Two-dimensional, symmetric diffuser to be optimized.

Figure 10. Two-dimensional, symmetric diffuser to be optimized.

Figure 11. The experiment data, SVM approximation (response surface) to the search space and the DE optimum solution and its CFD verification in the diffuser optimization.

Figure 11. The experiment data, SVM approximation (response surface) to the search space and the DE optimum solution and its CFD verification in the diffuser optimization.

Figure 12. The evolving process of the 20 trail solutions in a population in DE optimization.

Figure 12. The evolving process of the 20 trail solutions in a population in DE optimization.

Figure 13. The curved parameterized contour range and the optimum contour obtained by DE optimization.

Figure 13. The curved parameterized contour range and the optimum contour obtained by DE optimization.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.