Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Research Article

The effect of individual differences in episodic future thought on perceived credibility

Felicity O’Connella Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKCorrespondence[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-7198

Chantelle Cartera Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

Paul Taylora Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-7667

Zarah Vernhamb Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-0365

Lara Warmelinka Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-9448

Figures & data

Table 1. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive intention descriptions.

Download CSV Display Table

Table 2. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive mental image.

Download CSV Display Table

Table 3. Ordinal regression table for EDT scores predicting responses to EFT measures in the post interview questionnaire (N = 80).

Download CSV Display Table

Table 4. Wilcoxon signed rank test for number of details and words used in intentions description and mental image description in the truthful versus deceptive conditions.

Download CSV Display Table

Table 5. Wilcoxon signed rank test post interview questionnaire EFT measures in truthful versus deceptive conditions (N = 80).

Download CSV Display Table

Table 6. Linear regression – EDT scores predicting number of details and words in truthful and deceptive statements.

Download CSV Display Table

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (39.6 KB)

The effect of individual differences in episodic future thought on perceived credibility

Table 1. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive intention descriptions.

Table 2. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive mental image.

Table 3. Ordinal regression table for EDT scores predicting responses to EFT measures in the post interview questionnaire (N = 80).

Table 4. Wilcoxon signed rank test for number of details and words used in intentions description and mental image description in the truthful versus deceptive conditions.

Table 5. Wilcoxon signed rank test post interview questionnaire EFT measures in truthful versus deceptive conditions (N = 80).

Table 6. Linear regression – EDT scores predicting number of details and words in truthful and deceptive statements.

Supplemental Material

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

The effect of individual differences in episodic future thought on perceived credibility

Figures & data

Table 1. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive intention descriptions.

Table 2. Linear regression – EDT score predicting number of details and words used in truthful and deceptive mental image.

Table 3. Ordinal regression table for EDT scores predicting responses to EFT measures in the post interview questionnaire (N = 80).

Table 4. Wilcoxon signed rank test for number of details and words used in intentions description and mental image description in the truthful versus deceptive conditions.

Table 5. Wilcoxon signed rank test post interview questionnaire EFT measures in truthful versus deceptive conditions (N = 80).

Table 6. Linear regression – EDT scores predicting number of details and words in truthful and deceptive statements.

Supplemental Material

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date