875
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

4 out of 5 Students Surveyed Would Recommend this Activity (Comparing Chewing Gum Flavor Durations)

, &

Figures & data

Figure 1. Example Class Data for Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum

Figure 1. Example Class Data for Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum

Figure 2. Descriptive Statistics and Boxplot of Example Class Differences (differences are formed by: Brand 1 - Brand 2)

Figure 2. Descriptive Statistics and Boxplot of Example Class Differences (differences are formed by: Brand 1 - Brand 2)

Figure 3. Example Class Data for Spearmint Stick Gum

Figure 3. Example Class Data for Spearmint Stick Gum

Figure 4. Assessing Normality for the Example Class Differences

Figure 4. Assessing Normality for the Example Class Differences

Figure 5. Boxplot of Example Class Differences (differences are formed by: Brand 1 - Brand 2)

Figure 5. Boxplot of Example Class Differences (differences are formed by: Brand 1 - Brand 2)

Figure 6. Example Censored Class Data for Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum (Brand 1)

Figure 6. Example Censored Class Data for Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum (Brand 1)

Figure 7. Survival Table and Survival Function for Example Censored Class Data

Figure 7. Survival Table and Survival Function for Example Censored Class Data

Figure 8. Example Censored Class Data for two Brands of Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum

Figure 8. Example Censored Class Data for two Brands of Sugar-free Cinnamon Stick Gum

Figure 9. Survival Functions for Example Censored Class Data

Figure 9. Survival Functions for Example Censored Class Data

Figure 10. Test Statistics and P-Values for Determining a Significant Difference Between the Two Survival Rates

Figure 10. Test Statistics and P-Values for Determining a Significant Difference Between the Two Survival Rates

Figure 11. Example Class Texture Scores for Piece (Tablet vs. Stick) and Flavor (Spearmint vs. Winterfresh) Two-Way ANOVA

Figure 11. Example Class Texture Scores for Piece (Tablet vs. Stick) and Flavor (Spearmint vs. Winterfresh) Two-Way ANOVA

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the response variable Texture based upon the four treatments.

Table 2. Two-way ANOVA summary table for the response variable Texture.

Dependent Variable: TEXTURE

Figure 12. Profile Plot of Piece (Tablet vs. Stick) and Flavor (Spearmint vs. Winterfresh) for the Response Variable Texture.

Figure 12. Profile Plot of Piece (Tablet vs. Stick) and Flavor (Spearmint vs. Winterfresh) for the Response Variable Texture.

Table 3. Descriptive statistics for the response variable Texture based upon the Flavor of gum.

Table 4. Descriptive statistics for the response variable Texture based upon the Piece of gum.

Figure 13. Example Class Texture Scores for Randomized Block Design

Figure 13. Example Class Texture Scores for Randomized Block Design

Table 5. ANOVA summary table for randomized block design.

Dependent Variable: TEXTURE

Table 6. Descriptive statistics for the response variable Texture based upon the treatment.

Dependent Variable: TEXTURE

Flavor Duration in Minutes 40c = censored at 40 minutes

Supplemental material

UJSE_A_11910561_SM0001.zip

Download Zip (478.8 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.