Figures & data
Figure 1. A bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel model with three waves of data. αt and δt are autoregressive effects of WX and WY, respectively. γt and βt are the cross-lagged effects of on
and
on
respectively. The mean structure with
and
is not explicitly included here.
![Figure 1. A bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel model with three waves of data. αt and δt are autoregressive effects of WX and WY, respectively. γt and βt are the cross-lagged effects of WX,t−1 on WY,t and WY,t−1 on WX,t, respectively. The mean structure with μX,t and μY,t is not explicitly included here.](/cms/asset/ba61d2ce-14a8-4360-9b8e-8ed632b7c86e/hsem_a_2122467_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Results of preliminary power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 100 replications, for a cross-lagged effect of 0.10 (standardized). The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.
![Figure 3. Results of preliminary power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 100 replications, for a cross-lagged effect of 0.10 (standardized). The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.](/cms/asset/f866d530-938f-4c48-a88d-94521fde7ea5/hsem_a_2122467_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Results of the validation phase of the power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 2000 replications. The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.
![Figure 4. Results of the validation phase of the power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 2000 replications. The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.](/cms/asset/98a564a8-fa96-4e22-8f67-cd302b85c3b2/hsem_a_2122467_f0004_c.jpg)