10,293
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Teacher's Corner

Power Analysis for the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model Using the powRICLPM R-Package

Pages 645-658 | Received 25 Jul 2022, Accepted 05 Sep 2022, Published online: 21 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. A bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel model with three waves of data. αt and δt are autoregressive effects of WX and WY, respectively. γt and βt are the cross-lagged effects of WX,t1 on WY,t and WY,t1 on WX,t, respectively. The mean structure with μX,t and μY,t is not explicitly included here.

Figure 1. A bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel model with three waves of data. αt and δt are autoregressive effects of WX and WY, respectively. γt and βt are the cross-lagged effects of WX,t−1 on WY,t and WY,t−1 on WX,t, respectively. The mean structure with μX,t and μY,t is not explicitly included here.

Figure 2. Overview of power analysis procedure used by powRICLPM.

Figure 2. Overview of power analysis procedure used by powRICLPM.

Figure 3. Results of preliminary power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 100 replications, for a cross-lagged effect of 0.10 (standardized). The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.

Figure 3. Results of preliminary power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 100 replications, for a cross-lagged effect of 0.10 (standardized). The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.

Figure 4. Results of the validation phase of the power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 2000 replications. The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.

Figure 4. Results of the validation phase of the power analysis for the RI-CLPM, based on 2000 replications. The different panels display results for conditions with a 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 proportion of between-unit variance, respectively. The vertical error bars represent the uncertainty around the simulated power.