548
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Preparation and performance evaluation of saquinavir laden cationic submicron emulsions

, , &
Pages 37-44 | Received 16 May 2008, Accepted 24 Jul 2008, Published online: 01 Jan 2009

Figures & data

Table 1. Compositions (%) (w/w) of different optimized submicron emulsion incorporating SQ.

Table 2. Zeta potentials; mean particle size and entrapment efficiency of submicron emulsion formulations.

Figure 1. Normal phase contrast microscopy of various submicron emulsions (magnification ×100). E: Plain emulsion without and charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. CE: Submiron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer.

Figure 1.  Normal phase contrast microscopy of various submicron emulsions (magnification ×100). E: Plain emulsion without and charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. CE: Submiron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer.

Figure 2. Cumulative release profile of SQ from submicron emulsion in PBS, pH 7.4. The values represented are means of three individual experiments. The experiment was performed using dialysis tubing (with cut-off mol. wt. 12,000). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Figure 2.  Cumulative release profile of SQ from submicron emulsion in PBS, pH 7.4. The values represented are means of three individual experiments. The experiment was performed using dialysis tubing (with cut-off mol. wt. 12,000). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Table 3. Effect of storage time on stability of different submicron emulsion formulations at room temperature.

Figure 3. Effect of different submicron emulsion on cell viability on J 774 MΦ at three different concentrations (A = 1 μg/ml; B = 10 μg/ml; C = 100 μg/ml) by MTT assay. The error bars indicates ± SD of three set of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Figure 3.  Effect of different submicron emulsion on cell viability on J 774 MΦ at three different concentrations (A = 1 μg/ml; B = 10 μg/ml; C = 100 μg/ml) by MTT assay. The error bars indicates ± SD of three set of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Figure 4. Apparent permeability coefficient (×10−6) of various submicron emulsions obtained using in-vitro everted intestinal sac method. The error bars indicates ± SD of three sets of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Figure 4.  Apparent permeability coefficient (×10−6) of various submicron emulsions obtained using in-vitro everted intestinal sac method. The error bars indicates ± SD of three sets of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer.

Figure 5. Effect of different formulations on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in ileal loop of rat small intestine. The error bars indicates ± SD of three set of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer. Triton x-100 and plain saline was taken as positive and negative control, respectively.

Figure 5.  Effect of different formulations on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in ileal loop of rat small intestine. The error bars indicates ± SD of three set of experiments (n = 3). CE: Submicron emulsion containing chitosan as charge inducer. PE: Submicron emulsion containing protamine as charge inducer. SE: Submicron emulsion containing stearylamine as charge inducer. E: Plain emulsion without any charge inducer. Triton x-100 and plain saline was taken as positive and negative control, respectively.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.